Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs-agent2 #145

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: -- [...truncated 2.05 MB...] tweak-for-jsonly: ide: post-build: [mkdir] Created dir:

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1225

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: -- [...truncated 136.50 KB...] [echo] swc-date is 05/21/20 04:20 + [delete] Deleting:

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs-agent2 #144

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: -- [...truncated 2.05 MB...] tweak-for-jsonly: ide: post-build: [mkdir] Created dir:

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1224

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: -- [...truncated 135.86 KB...] [echo] swc-date is 05/21/20 02:54 + [delete] Deleting:

Re: Script Loading Order (Continuing Heads-Up thread from Users)

2020-05-20 Thread Alex Harui
When I mentioned static initializers in my earlier post, it was about the timing of when some code would first access hljs. Most externs will probably be first used from code that runs after application.start(). But if someone did: public static var HLJSClass:Class = hljs; Then that would

Re: Script Loading Order (Continuing Heads-Up thread from Users)

2020-05-20 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Yishay, sorry to benign late here. I'm just with few time these days. I think we should not mix concepts. One thing is, a @extern should work as alway (using the inject_XXX we finally choose), for various reasons: we want the stub to be related in that part to the js library that's mirroring

Re: About the cumbersome random compilation issue

2020-05-20 Thread Carlos Rovira
Hi Greg, next time I'll get a fail compilation I'll store the results and comment. Other thing I'm wondering if is something only related to TDJ (jewel apps) and that's not happening for Basic, Express, or MXRoyale El mar., 19 may. 2020 a las 0:04, Greg Dove () escribió: > Carlos, it would be

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs-agent2 #143

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: [yishayjobs] Add a static counter for uids. -- [...truncated 2.05 MB...] tweak-for-jsonly: ide: post-build: [mkdir]

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1223

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
re.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/ws/frameworks/themes/Spark> create-description: [echo] build.number is 20200520 js-output-royale-description: swf-js-output-royale-description: create-config: playerglobal-setswfversion: create-config: [copy] Copying 1 file to <http://apacheroyaleci2.westus

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs-agent2 #142

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
See Changes: [yishayjobs] Don't have ApplicationLayout hardwired into mx application. -- [...truncated 2.05 MB...] tweak-for-jsonly: ide:

Re: Separate mailing list for Jenkins notifications

2020-05-20 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Ok I noticed that we have notifications list, but it seems to me that it is empty. I will redirect one of the build there and see if it works. [1] [1] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?notificati...@royale.apache.org wt., 19 maj 2020 o 10:17 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > My proposition is

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #1222

2020-05-20 Thread apacheroyaleci
ci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/ws/frameworks/themes/Spark> create-description: [echo] build.number is 20200520 js-output-royale-description: swf-js-output-royale-description: create-config: playerglobal-setswfversion: create-config: [copy] Copying 1 file to <

RE: Script Loading Order (Continuing Heads-Up thread from Users)

2020-05-20 Thread Yishay Weiss
Several questions/comments: 1. When you say static initializers should be lazy, do you mean load on the first lib api call? If so, wouldn’t that force async calls? 2. Do you have a way of using static initializers for externs files, which is how hljs was originally used? 3. To

Re: Script Loading Order (Continuing Heads-Up thread from Users)

2020-05-20 Thread Alex Harui
OK, I looked at the commit for hljs, and the code it replaced. AFAICT, that is an instantiation phase dependency and not a initialization phase dependency, so it should not matter if it loads before or after app.js (unless someone does use it in a non-lazy static initializer, which should be