Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

OK, I think I saw Maven build with and without the Flash stuff. I pushed the changes to the release branch. The changes required reverting the version numbers on royale-compiler and royale-asjs but not royale-typedefs. To build with the Adobe stuff with Maven, you will have to use system

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

The reason I am unsure about this release is that, in theory, we all agreed to be PMC members to make growing the community our primary goal. To achieve that goal, we should be doing things to attract not just new users, but even more importantly, new committers. We know we've got tons of

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

The value is different for each individual's computer. It is meant as an acceptance of a LICENSE, not a workaround to avoid acceptance of a LICENSE. -Alex On 9/23/19, 9:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: Do you have this env. setup

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Anyone know what should Carlos setup in that environment variable to pass farther? On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 7:18 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > process did the same endless loop. > > @Piotr Zarzycki do you mean to add to may > .bash_profile "export >

[Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Carlos, Well I don't see importance from user perspective to that changes at all. It means that you are not going to vote? Thanks, Piotr On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 7:22 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > I will stop for today, want to work a bit on royale-docs mobile layout that > I have near

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi, I will stop for today, want to work a bit on royale-docs mobile layout that I have near finish, so I'll wait for Alex changes and try tomorrow. IMHO this stuff is important, so it's worth the waiting time of a day or two. Thanks El lun., 23 sept. 201. 9 a las 17:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi, process did the same endless loop. @Piotr Zarzycki do you mean to add to may .bash_profile "export systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted= 6d2bc022" ? El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 18:40, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Do you have this

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Do you have this env. setup systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted ? You need to have with value I think 6d2bc022. pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 18:33 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script > seems to end

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Piotr, For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time: "Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022 ) Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022 The

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. I would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are waiting too long for release. pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui napisał(a): > Depends on your definition of small. The .mvn/extensions.xml is missing >

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Alex, Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go with release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some small workarounds he will be able to build that as well. Thanks, Piotr pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui napisał(a): > Update: There is

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Update: There is definitely a problem with the source package that prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine. I have some changes pending. This is going to be a pretty large commit as if affects a lot of files. I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos continue to try

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Piotr, sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2 repositories. In the real one there's no such layout Going to rerun again. El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Ok so what is the output of your build now ? > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Ok so what is the output of your build now ? pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the > sending. > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Piotr, since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the sending. The only difference is the file exposed in my last email El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Carlos, > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Carlos, Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and post links. pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi all, > > Piotr and I discover off list the following: > > this is what I have in my .m2 > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi, sorry, but just notice that both layouts are exactly the same :? The only change is in playerglobal-20.0.pom.lastUpdated Piotrs is: #NOTE: This is an Aether internal implementation file, its format can be changed without prior notice. #Tue Aug 13 05:59:44 CEST 2019

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi all, Piotr and I discover off list the following: this is what I have in my .m2 [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png] and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list: [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png] how is possible Piotr and I get

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Carlos, It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into Maven folder and try again. Thanks, Piotr pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi, > > sorry to say that build failed.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi, sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same problem with flash player as always: 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hey Carlos, Answers inline. pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow: > > 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's another > way? > Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Piotr, I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow: 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's another way? 2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile? 3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Carlos, Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release. According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi, yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml. I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build directly with maven with a clean .m2 In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual from clean, it works all ok As well I tried

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues trying that. - Josh On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Josh, > > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough to > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now. > >

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Josh, Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough to get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now. Thanks, Piotr On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala wrote: > I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be required for > JS-only builds,

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

I provided you concrete info what to do, but You expected a solution - that's a whole different story. :) No problem I hope we will get vote from some one else. Thanks, Piotr On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 11:32 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > HI Piotr, > > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

HI Piotr, since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some concrete info, or I'll end going like chicken without head :) I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too. Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7 thanks Carlos El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that setup staging link repository. Currently in that file you have Snapshot links and release. Based on this you can setup staging. Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the previous releases. I'm not sure even if that

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Piort, can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml? thanks El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Switching subject to discuss. > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And run >

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Carlos, Whenever you reply you need to edit subject to make sure that you responding to the right thread. Gmail issue. Thanks, Piotr On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 5:40 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Josh, > > with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after mvn > clean install -P

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Switching subject to discuss. Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And run approve script again. Thanks, Piotr On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Curious thing is: > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this: > > mvn -s

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

If I'm correct approval scripts do both. Try and report if you have any problems. Remember about Josh's modifications. On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 2:41 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi Piotr, I'm not using the Approval script xml, I'm building with Maven as > instructions report. > I can use Approval

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Piotr, I'm not using the Approval script xml, I'm building with Maven as instructions report. I can use Approval script too but I think that will be another way to do things (and another will be ANT build too). El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 13:48, Piotr Zarzycki (< piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>)

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hmm...Approval script is building stuff for you by Maven. Modify it as Josh suggested and run according to instruction in Voting thread. On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 1:06 PM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi, > > having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I tried > ANT and all went

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think. Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to instruct user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on preparing and testing

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Correct. ApproveRoyale.xml is not even in the source package. I just didn't want Josh to push that change. -Alex On 9/20/19, 9:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: Alex, Second issue is a blocker only for someone who wanted to developing Royale SDK, from my perspective it is

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

I don't know. Would be nice to get other's opinions. We make these attempts to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so when that workflow isn't working it doesn't make us look good. FWIW, if you clone the repo and try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should probably

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Alex, Second issue is a blocker only for someone who wanted to developing Royale SDK, from my perspective it is not a blocker for a release. Thanks, Piotr pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:13 Alex Harui napisał(a): > Specifically, requiring the profile generate-swcs-for-swf will fail when > running

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Specifically, requiring the profile generate-swcs-for-swf will fail when running ApproveRoyale.xml in a js-only configuration. My commit last night detects env.AIR_HOME and selects the set of profiles to use. I saw it work for both js-only and js-swf configurations. -Alex On 9/20/19, 9:02

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

What won't work exactly ? Build ? Or Royale for user IDE ? pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 17:57 Alex Harui napisał(a): > Please don't commit that. It won't work for js-only. > > I pushed a solution for both last night. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > > Hi

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Please don't commit that. It won't work for js-only. I pushed a solution for both last night. Thanks, -Alex On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: Hi Josh, Maybe you could commit that to develop? Thanks, Piotr czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Alex, I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for not working build without some env. variables is just have section Known issues in our announcement? Thanks, Piotr pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > Hi Josh, > > Maybe you could commit that to

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Josh, Maybe you could commit that to develop? Thanks, Piotr czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala napisał(a): > If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the > ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section > where the framework is built: > >

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section where the framework is built: -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Btw. When you answering trough Gmail make sure by Editing Title to which thread are responding in. Delete "RE", cause it probably will end up with creating new thread. czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 10:14 Piotr Zarzycki napisał(a): > Hi Guys, > > RC2 ready to test. Josh provides in discuss thread how to

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

Hi Guys, RC2 ready to test. Josh provides in discuss thread how to get my keys to check signature. gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys D5C80F47 Thanks, Piotr czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 10:08 Apache Royale CI Server napisał(a): > This is the discussion thread. > > Thanks, > Piotr --