Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Alex, The version number here came from package.json so it should have been updated by someone. I reinstalled from the link you provided with no problem. But running the royale server:debug [1] command gives me the same errors as before. I noticed that when running: royale new  

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

On Tue, May 1, 2018, 8:13 PM Alex Harui wrote: > That's my windows machine that I used for 0.9.2. > > Where did it say 0.9.3? It shows up after the npm install completes. I'm trying to remember if I published the package to NPM or if you did. > Maybe the scripts are

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

That's my windows machine that I used for 0.9.2. Where did it say 0.9.3? I'm trying to remember if I published the package to NPM or if you did. Maybe the scripts are running or were run after some versions got updated in the repos. I have not run a build on my windows machine since the

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Om, > > I got the warnings when we released 0.9.2 but it appeared to leave a > functional SDK. Now it is hanging for me and Dany. > > I don't think I've run a publish and I don't think the CI server is > either, but

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Om, I got the warnings when we released 0.9.2 but it appeared to leave a functional SDK. Now it is hanging for me and Dany. I don't think I've run a publish and I don't think the CI server is either, but you never know. Try grabbing one of the SWCs. Unzip it and swfdump the library.swf.

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi Om I also noticed that 0.9.3 was installeren so I tried ...@0.9.2 but that was non existing. ...@0.9.1 did exist but gave the same result/errors -Dany Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 1 mei 2018 om 19:48 heeft OmPrakash Muppirala het > volgende geschreven: > >> On

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Dany, > > The link is directly to a tar.gz built by our CI server. No humans > involved, and no special packaging for NPM. NPM says it can install any > tar.gz file. Try downloading the file at that link and

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi Om, I did that! In the mean time I tried all sorts of things: install 0.9.1 instead of 0.9.3 reinstalled npm nothing works -Dany > Op 30 apr. 2018, om 09:59 heeft OmPrakash Muppirala > het volgende geschreven: > > Dany, > > I haven't tested this on a Mac. I am

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Dany, I haven't tested this on a Mac. I am told that Mac users need to use "sudo install npm " depending on how they installed npm. Perhaps you can try that out? Thanks, Om On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Dany Dhondt wrote: > Hi Om, > > Thanks for pointing that out. >

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi Om, Thanks for pointing that out. I’ll have a go with that scenario. 1. (re) installing royale npm install @apache-royale/royale-js -g WARN tar invalid entry extract:@apache-royale/royale-js: verb lock using /Users/dany/.npm/_locks/staging-3a08f0df5026584d.lock for

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

>...I would like to see it posted with a big button at the end saying ‘TRY ROYALE NOW' Additionally to what Om said, we're also working on a browser app which will let you try out Apache Royale in the browser online: Write MXML/AS3 and click just one button in order to compile your code and to

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi Jerry, it seems to me that you already answered to our draft of the "Life after FlashPlayer" post which will be published on the Flex lists soon. So, first thanks for your feedback! It would be great if you would post your thoughts on the upcoming "Life after FlashPlayer" thread again as soon

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi Alex, good idea, I've revised the draft [1]. If there aren't any objections, I'll post this at dev@flex and users@flex in about 24 hours. Thanks, Olaf [1] Life after FlashPlayer, are you prepared? Hello from the Apache Royale (FlexJS) team, even if Flex with AIR is still an awesome

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Dany Dhondt wrote: > Hi all, > > A few thoughts: > > > In our organization, I built a big backoffice web application in Flex > about 2 years ago. Now, we are obliged to make it future proof, which > means, no Flash dependency at all. > We

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi all, A few thoughts: In our organization, I built a big backoffice web application in Flex about 2 years ago. Now, we are obliged to make it future proof, which means, no Flash dependency at all. We chose react.js. So the last couple of months, I studied react, npm, node, webpack, babel,

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

+1 for Olaf's email and Alex's changes. Piotr On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 7:15 AM Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Olaf, > > Great first draft! It is fine as is, and I really like that it is short. > > The only thing I'm tempted to try to add is an earlier introduction to who > "we"

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi Olaf, Great first draft! It is fine as is, and I really like that it is short. The only thing I'm tempted to try to add is an earlier introduction to who "we" are, that it is the Royale/FlexJS folks asking and not the Flex PMC or some other group. So one idea is to just to start with

Re: [Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Here are a few points that may or may not help: 1- I was a long time Flex Developer 2- I do not have an app in either app store 3- The Flex market moved away from me, thanks to Steve Jobs, Adobe and other factors 4- I’m now doing Swift development for mobile (soon will start an Android

[Discussion] "Life after FlashPlayer" post @flex lists (Was: Royale Frameworks and More)

Hi, > IMO, we don’t need a survey, just the right words in the subject and body > of emails that will start > > > discussion and elicit responses... After thinking about it a bit more I came to the conclusion that there's no need to mention Royale as an alternative to Flex in order to start a