Re: Apache Royale Pure AS3 without MXML

Hi Matthew 2018-05-14 6:05 GMT+02:00 mshaffer12882 : > Thanks for your quick response! I checked out all of your suggestions and > it > works very well. I've been playing with MXML for a while now and it is > very > simple and fast! I'm looking forward to Jewel and

Re: Apache Royale Pure AS3 without MXML

Thanks for your quick response! I checked out all of your suggestions and it works very well. I've been playing with MXML for a while now and it is very simple and fast! I'm looking forward to Jewel and have been following the refactoring that is being done. The reason for my post is I noticed

Re: Apache Royale Pure AS3 without MXML

Hi Matthew, thanks for the input, we worked hard since the rebranding to make this project one of the technologies for people to take into account! :) as Alex said this project is only AS3 https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/develop/examples/royale/DataBindingExample_as I just try it

Re: Apache Royale Pure AS3 without MXML

Hi, It's been a while since I tried it, but one of the examples is DataBindingExample_as. It is intended as an example for how to get an Application up and running without MXML. Also note that in Royale, MXML should have less overhead than in Flex and should make you more productive than

Re: Apache Royale Pure AS3 without MXML

Hi, I believe it is! We have even some examples [1]. Is this what you are looking for? [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/tree/develop/examples/native Thanks, Piotr On Sat, May 12, 2018, 7:46 AM mshaffer12882 wrote: > Hi! > > First thanks for all your hard

Apache Royale Pure AS3 without MXML

Hi! First thanks for all your hard work, I've followed this project since it was FlexJS and I'm really excited about all the progress that has been made and the re-branding of Apache Royale! Is it possible to to build a pure AS3 application without using MXML using Apache Royale SDK? --