Re: Abstract getters and setters

Yeah, I started on it yesterday, and I don't see why I can't finish it up in April. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:49 AM Harbs wrote: > Thanks Josh, > > Is that something you can see yourself working on? > > Thanks, > Harbs > > > On Mar 27,

Re: Abstract getters and setters

Thanks Josh, Is that something you can see yourself working on? Thanks, Harbs > On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:47 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > > I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is > any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters just > never

Re: Abstract getters and setters

Ohh That would be nice ! Although I didn’t get used to have these new features. Piotr Zarzycki On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 17:48, Josh Tynjala wrote: > I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is > any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters

Re: Abstract getters and setters

I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters just never crossed my mind when I implemented abstract methods. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:19 AM