Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

; >><yishayj...@hotmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > This looks very promising. I’m going to read this in batches. Some > >> >> > feedback on ‘The data model’. > >> >> > > >> >> &g

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

> >> > repos = configurator.data.repos; >> >> > projectName = configurator.data.projectName; >> >> > >> >> > Shouldn’t these be cast to a String and an Array respectively? >> >> > >> >> > Also,

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

>> > projectName = configurator.data.projectName; > >> > > >> > Shouldn’t these be cast to a String and an Array respectively? > >> > > >> > Also, I find these lines a bit misleading > >> > > >> > > >> > > >&

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

>>Since some of the viewers will be first timers I think it’s important to >>put code in script blocks. >That's up to Andrew. He's our "editor-in-chief". Argh! But, yes, code should usually be in script blocks. I will go look at the specific page. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Alex Harui

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

Also, I find these lines a bit misleading >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > import org.apache.royale.events.Event; >> > >> > >> > Since some of the viewers will be first timers I think it’s important >>to >> > put code i

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

v8k8Itgxne4cdi8W%2F5mqQtZkg9MWsBviM%3D=0> >>> >>> ____________ >>> From: Alex Harui >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 10:49:58 PM >>> To: dev@royale.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed

RE: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

LID> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 8:50 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation) Hi, I've pushed what I will call a first draft of the main portion of a tutorial for

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

I forgot to mention that the tutorial requires the nightly build. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Alex Harui Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 10:49:58 PM To: dev@royale.apache.org Subject: Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

Hi, I've pushed what I will call a first draft of the main portion of a tutorial for using Royale. See: http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/RoyaleDocs_Stagin g/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/_site/create-an-application/application-tuto rial.html Feedback welcome. Looks

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

On 1/26/18, 11:43 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote: >I don't think we need to build out the full ToC up front, rather than PAYG >haha. There are tons of pages that I have not yet listed in the Google >doc, >and several decisions we have to make. > >For example, we have an

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

I don't think we need to build out the full ToC up front, rather than PAYG haha. There are tons of pages that I have not yet listed in the Google doc, and several decisions we have to make. For example, we have an Express set of controls and MDL and who knows what else. I presume we need to

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

Hi Andrew, Responses in-line. On 1/26/18, 2:48 AM, "Andrew Wetmore" wrote: >Good morning. > >Least thing first: Does the Apache header absolutely need to be in short >lines with hard line breaks so it takes up so much vertical space in the >file? Please look at

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

Good morning. Least thing first: Does the Apache header absolutely need to be in short lines with hard line breaks so it takes up so much vertical space in the file? Please look at test-apache-header.md and see whether the header laid out on fewer lines and trusting to line wrapping works. I am

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

Hi Andrew, I took a quick peek at the Adobe doc. I'm not sure "Development Phases" should be the first thing under "Create an application", especially given how the Adobe doc says that some of those sub-topics are not phases. Also, I think there is more than one way to develop an application.

Re: Royale in 10 minutes (was Re: Proposed table of contents for Royale help documentation)

Hi: I think the "Royale in 10 Minutes" goes where the ToC "Hello, World!" is in the "Get Started" section. I saw the "Create an Application" section as what you would turn to when you had gone through building a first little application and decided, yes, maybe this Royale is the thing I need for