Re: 0.9.6 Release

2019-06-17 Thread Alex Harui
ASDoc is not fully working for me. I've been working on that the past several days. It took quite a while to fix the JSON output from new and interesting ASDoc patterns. I'm now looking into failures due to changes in coercion rules in the JS output. ASDoc was trying to save time by using

Re: 0.9.6 Release

2019-06-17 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
I will try to run MX Tests locally and see what is happening. pon., 17 cze 2019 o 17:08 Alex Harui napisał(a): > ASDoc is not fully working for me. I've been working on that the past > several days. It took quite a while to fix the JSON output from new and > interesting ASDoc patterns. I'm

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #859

2019-06-17 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See -- [...truncated 2.34 MB...] [mxmlc] using source file:

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #860

2019-06-17 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See Changes: [aharui] ASDoc found these small issues [aharui] get asdoc to build with most if not all projects [aharui] use parent instead of itemrendererparent which is now

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs #2358

2019-06-17 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See -- [...truncated 707.90 KB...] [echo] ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME is C:\Program Files (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\compiler-jx [echo]

Re: 0.9.6 Release

2019-06-17 Thread Alex Harui
Mx tests are working locally for me with this last change to ListItemRenderer. So, the question for everyone is: is there anything else we want to put in before trying to cut a release? We might need to change the ASDoc app after Greg's last change. We might want to bang on ASDoc for a bit

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #861

2019-06-17 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See -- [...truncated 2.34 MB...] [mxmlc] using source file:

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs #2359

2019-06-17 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_MXTests #862

2019-06-17 Thread Apache Royale CI Server
See

Re: 0.9.6 Release

2019-06-17 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Alex, Thank you! I will be working in release next week, so if anyone have anything to add there is some time. Thanks, Piotr On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 7:28 AM Alex Harui wrote: > Mx tests are working locally for me with this last change to > ListItemRenderer. > > So, the question for everyone

Suggestion to request Royale addition to Facebook's 'flash migration recommendations'

2019-06-17 Thread Greg Dove
fyi I got a ping today from Facebook today about flash migrations to html5. If anyone knows how to contact them internally to request that they update their options, this page [1] could do with a Royale mention, I believe. In case you're wondering, yes, I know of cases where Flex was used in the

Re: [royale-asjs] 04/04: suppress implicit coercions because we cheat and use JSON objects instead of actual instances

2019-06-17 Thread Greg Dove
Hi Alex, My apologies, but I may have messed this directive up a bit with the earlier change from 'negative' to 'positive' semantics in the config settings. I just added compiler tests for the output variations and adjusted the logic for these checks to make them pass, so now the following should

Re: Compiler Performance (was Re: Problem with Vectors)

2019-06-17 Thread Alex Harui
Folks are welcome to try various incremental compilation ideas. I'm not sure you can guarantee a benefit in all cases when compiling from the command-line because you still may have to parse every file that is a dependency or encode/save/reload some sort of state cache. There should be ways

Re: 0.9.6 Release

2019-06-17 Thread Alex Harui
I just saw ASDoc work well enough for me to start with mx.binding.BindabilityInfo and switch to mx.charts.AxisRenderer. There might be JSON parsing issues with other classes. Run the bin/js-debug version, check the console if things don't load and see what file failed to load and why. I will

Re: Compiler Performance (was Re: Problem with Vectors)

2019-06-17 Thread yishayw
Without knowing much about the compiler, what about incremental compilation? Can gains be made by checking for source update timestamps and making a decision as to whether or not to transpile based on that? -- Sent from: http://apache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com/

Re: 0.9.6 Release

2019-06-17 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi Alex, I don't see any answer here - can I start with trying your instruction and start release ? Thanks, Piotr śr., 12 cze 2019 o 10:12 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Hi Alex, > just build from scratch right now and seems maven and ant was ok > > El mié., 12 jun. 2019 a las 10:02, Alex Harui