IMO, we won't lose anything without playerglobal. All JS compiles in the
Royale JSOnly nightly build package don't have playerglobal/airglobal.
As you saw, there are currently some nasty circularities in the build
workflow for Ant. AIUI, Maven gets around it by not running every test.
There isn
I will probably revert it soon.
Thanks, Piotr
2017-11-19 23:35 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> > - ${royale.typedefs.version}
> > + 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> Is hard coding the version number really a good idea? We would have to
> change it every release.
>
> Also setting it to snapshot m
Hi,
> - ${royale.typedefs.version}
> + 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT
Is hard coding the version number really a good idea? We would have to change
it every release.
Also setting it to snapshot may mean inconsistent results from time to time as
snapshots change.
Thanks,
Justin
Give others to look into that! :)
Thanks! Piotr
2017-11-19 20:44 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> Ok Piotr,
> I'll ok, I'll modify that in short.
> Thanks! :)
>
> 2017-11-19 19:09 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > This solution with link to wiki is really good :) I have only one
> c
Hi,
the get involved page is ready:
http://royale.codeoscopic.com/get-involved/
this page is very similar to the one in flex website, so not much to
comment here.
I only modified on to point to GitHub, issues (instead of JIRA) and pull
request instead of patches.
As well ask people to contribu
Ok Piotr,
I'll ok, I'll modify that in short.
Thanks! :)
2017-11-19 19:09 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> Hi Carlos,
>
> This solution with link to wiki is really good :) I have only one comment:
> "We are working on other possible outputs like WebAssembly or SWF" - I
> think we should not mention S
Hi Carlos,
This solution with link to wiki is really good :) I have only one comment:
"We are working on other possible outputs like WebAssembly or SWF" - I
think we should not mention SWF here, cause compiler is able to do output
to SWF, it's ready. No one is working on that, rather on the framew
Hi,
just end Source Code page:
http://royale.codeoscopic.com/source-code/
Here I only mention the 3 repos that I consider are of interest for Royale
users. I'm talking about compiler, typedefs and framework.
The other three are website, docs and tourjs. I thought about those repos
and:
* websi
Hi Piotr,
compiler? seems to me more a pom config, isn't it?
I really don't know since I didn't look into that part, but in my way of
think, that should not be included inside compiler.
Thanks
2017-11-19 13:59 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> Carlos,
>
> In case of Maven build we will probably hav
Carlos,
In case of Maven build we will probably have to teach compiler about that.
Of course I may be wrong. :)
Piotr
2017-11-19 13:28 GMT+01:00 Carlos Rovira :
> That sounds very good Alex
> I think having flash/flex/air added as a "plugin" later for people that
> would want to add that output
That sounds very good Alex
I think having flash/flex/air added as a "plugin" later for people that
would want to add that output, is the better approach.
As well, that would make the weight lighter, and for building, in the case
of maven will remove all the artifact dependencies to flash/flex and t
>
> The whole point of the feature/rename branch is to remove references to
> Flex and Flash and that includes removing dependency on both
> playerglobal.swc and airglobal.swc.
>
> My goal is that the first Royale release does not require
> playerglobal/airglobal, but you can bring it down as an op
12 matches
Mail list logo
