Re: Browserstack Open Source License for Apache Royale project

Om, 2018-03-28 19:45 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala : > I wouldn't call them sponsors. There is an ASF level Sponsorship page [1] > and this might conflict with that. > > I think a `Thanks to` page is fine. > If you prefer that name is ok for me I'll change to it. I

Re: Browserstack Open Source License for Apache Royale project

Ok Piotr, I see there's no conversation on this topic, so I'll wait until all is settled thanks 2018-03-28 18:35 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Carlos, > > I think you should wait a bit longer. I personally always wait about 48 > hours, due to time shifts it is the most

@royaleignorecoercion and @royaleemitcoercion

FYI: I’ve been spending a lot of time cleaning up the coercions in the framework code. All the “as” calls add measurable time when combined. To make it clear when as coercions are really needed, I started adding annotations to *every* use of coercions and I use either @royaleignorecoercion or

Re: Layout optimizations

I’m still working on this. I tried simply removing all measurement from the layout to see what would happen. In my app, everything continued to work exactly as before and removing the measuring made about a 10% performance increase in Application.start(). I guess none of the layouts I’m

Re: Browserstack Open Source License for Apache Royale project

Hi - I note that on the Browserstack Open Source page [1] there are a list of logos. We are not agreeing to allow any Apache or Royale logo to appear anywhere in their site. If they wish to do so then we will need to point them to the appropriate Foundation committee - likely starting with

Re: Browserstack Open Source License for Apache Royale project

I wouldn't call them sponsors. There is an ASF level Sponsorship page [1] and this might conflict with that. I think a `Thanks to` page is fine. Also, Adobe is seen twice :-) And just as a disclaimer, you are the owner of Codescopic, right? Thanks, Om [1]

Re: Browserstack Open Source License for Apache Royale project

Hi, so if there's no agree/disagree with the new sponsors page I assume I can go with it and complete? I'll wait a few hours thanks Carlos 2018-03-28 0:33 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi, > > I created a draft page on website for this: > > * I called it "Sponsors",

Re: typeNames in View

Thanks Alex, Peter, I don't see a problem with names with this classes...just that for me seems there's much more, but maybe due to the fact problem with Flash...but in my mind that should not be a problem and for me a refactor could be more to collapse Container (remove it and put any

Re: typeNames in View

The differences exist mainly because of the Player and its lack of native support for scrolling. I created these classes as a building block and I tried to keep it as PAYG as possible. If you do not really want to use the Player, then just use Group. When you need scrolling, add to that specific