Re: ERROR MIGRATE FLEX TO APACHE ROYALE

If you are using Windows, have you set the environment variable: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 Alos, the latest nightly build may no longer require that option. -Alex On 7/17/19, 3:02 PM, "SmartSoft Ltda" wrote: Hi friends, I have error when migrate flex to apache royale. The

ERROR MIGRATE FLEX TO APACHE ROYALE

Hi friends, I have error when migrate flex to apache royale. The guide you use is: https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/migrate-an-existing-app/migrate-from-flex.html . This my source code: http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"

Re: Crux Branch

Personally, I don't think it should be named Swiz, and I support a new name. Crux seems fine to me. - Josh On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 1:58 AM Carlos Rovira wrote: > Hi Alex, > > your concerns about Crux name applies to the others like Basic or Jewel > (just to name a few). If I search for "Jewel

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_jsonly #3262

See -- [...truncated 1.71 MB...] [java] [java] c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs_jsonly\mustella\src\main\royale\UnitTester.as(1586): col: 2

Re: Crux Branch

Definitely I will get back to the discussion whether we are ready or not for 1.0 once I release 0.9.6. śr., 17 lip 2019 o 10:36 Carlos Rovira napisał(a): > Piotr, > > my guess around low adoption by old flex users and new users is that we are > still behind 1.0 and docs are still on the works.

Re: Crux Branch

Piotr, my guess around low adoption by old flex users and new users is that we are still behind 1.0 and docs are still on the works. When we get to pass that point we'll be able to be more aggressive in communication efforts. I mean try to be exposed in publications specialized webs, and more.

Re: Crux Branch

The reality is showing that since this project exists I don't see any single user who came from JS/.NET/Java world to our framework. Everyone who are interested are from Flex/ActionScript world. At the beginning the strategy with name changing was great, but it shows that is not working or even

Re: Crux Branch

Hi Yishay, El mié., 17 jul. 2019 a las 8:05, Yishay Weiss () escribió: > > It’s true we wanted a separated identity, but as I recall we always had In > mind to engage the Flex user base. I think it’s important to consider that > when deciding on a name. > > My point when I pushed the change to

RE: Crux Branch

Hi Carlos, >So for me is something to market with the rest of Royale (strand, beads, >jewel,...) that we decided together to separate from the marketing of Flex. It’s true we wanted a separated identity, but as I recall we always had In mind to engage the Flex user base. I think it’s important