Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #1134

2019-09-08 Thread Apache Royale CI Server 
See 


--
[...truncated 968.04 KB...]
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ObjectUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidBorderUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringTrimmer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Timer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIUtils
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Effect
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Transition
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFill
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidColor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IExternalizable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Proxy
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CursorBookmark
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ICollectionView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IList
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IViewCursor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionViewCursor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionViewBookmark
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayCollection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayList
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: XMLListCollection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CanvasLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Flex
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BoxDirection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: HBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PanelTitleBar
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGridColumn
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Button
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ISelectable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CheckBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ComboBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ComboBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ScrollControlBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGrid
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DateField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Label
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: List
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MenuBar
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: NumericStepper
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RadioButton
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RadioButtonGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TextArea
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITextInput
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TextInput
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITextFieldFactory
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Singleton
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ItemClickEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MenuEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MouseEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PropertyChangeEventKind
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Matrix
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Matrix
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerComplexComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IResourceBundle
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceManagerImpl
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceModuleInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceEventDispatcher
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceBundleProxy
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: GroupBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SkinnableComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ButtonBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Button
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ErrorArray
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RunCodeEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PasswordInputBead
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITileLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TileLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleUtils
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringPadder
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIDUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStroke
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CursorError
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SortError
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ISort
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Sort
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IXMLNotifiable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: XMLListAdapter
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: FlexChildInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BaseListData
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFactory
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IUITextField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UITextField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CollectionEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CollectionEventKind
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleSorter
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleID
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleRegistry
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceBundle
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIDUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LayoutBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BasicLayout
[mxm

Re: Heads up on XML

2019-09-08 Thread Alex Harui 
No problem.  I've spent today trying to fix the build in the Ant source 
package.  

-Alex

On 9/8/19, 10:03 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:

Not quite there yet with the final changes, I'm afraid. I'm getting
close... should be tomorrow my time.


On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:32 AM Greg Dove  wrote:

>
> Yeah thanks Josh, Alex made a suggestion for that option too, it was the
> one I thought I would try first. I hope to get there later today, so I 
will
> see if I can figure that out.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:20 AM Josh Tynjala 
> wrote:
>
>> I think the DITA files generated by asdoc are pretty big too, so they're
>> probably really useful for your testing.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On Friday, September 6, 2019, Greg Dove  wrote:
>> > 'I think that SWFDump will generate valid XML and there is a way to get
>> > DITA files from Flex ASDoc that are valid XML.'
>> > Sounds like a good idea for some large xml files. I did not use that
>> yet,
>> > so will take a look and see if I can figure it out. Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:30 PM Greg Dove  wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Just to clarify I was referring to this stuff here:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2F8ab1d813ee2f72bab957f9485e56ad89dcf6e1ab%2Fframeworks%2Fprojects%2FMXRoyale%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Froyale%2Fmx%2Frpc%2Fhttp%2FAbstractOperation.as%23L1038&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2ddad385aee2449833fd08d734e2fe46%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C637036021948216407&sdata=7V0k6g15%2FwI2JY7v7E32iLjX6lIUSkOs9%2BpRDfhOrGI%3D&reserved=0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> with '//old XML style'
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:24 PM Alex Harui 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I haven't looked at what XML is used/supported by MX HTTPService.  It
>> >>> looks like WebService does use MX HTTPService.  I am currently
>> migrating
>> >>> other things that WebService needs (XMLEncoder/Decoder,
>> >>> SOAPEncoder/Decoder).  These are new files that aren't in the repo
>> yet,
>> so
>> >>> HTTPService couldn't be relying on them or else their use is 
commented
>> >>> out.   The goal is to change as little as possible to get it to
>> compile
>> and
>> >>> then see if it runs.  I have no idea yet if the XML improvements you
>> are
>> >>> working on are going to be impactful on what I'm doing or not.
>> >>>
>> >>> BTW, I could be wrong, but I think that SWFDump will generate valid
>> XML
>> >>> and there is a way to get DITA files from Flex ASDoc that are valid
>> XML.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the heads up,
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> On 9/6/19, 5:14 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually I know you are looking into the WSDL stuff maybe 
this
>> is
>> >>> going
>> >>> to be important for that (not sure)?
>> >>> My goal is to get the XML stuff tidied up and ready to push by 
end
>> of
>> >>> day
>> >>> tomorrow, worst case the following morning, local time (UTC+12). 
I
>> >>> also
>> >>> need to find some big XML test cases to check the memory side of
>> >>> things.
>> >>> FYI there is also some XMLDocument stuff missing (commented out)
>> from
>> >>> some
>> >>> of the MX HttpService code, which came up in a recent issue. I
>> don't
>> >>> know
>> >>> if it shares any of the code from the WSDL stuff you are looking
>> at
>> or
>> >>> not...
>> >>> If it does then I don't want to double up on things, but
>> otherwise I
>> >>> will
>> >>> try to look at that on my Monday.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:02 PM Greg Dove 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Thanks for checking that.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > child is specified in 13.4.4.6 and essentially calls [[Get]]
>> >>> > (After cycling through this kind of thing a few times, I found
>> the
>> >>> easiest
>> >>> > way to find methods is to search in the spec for 'e.mehodName'
>> >>> which gets
>> >>> > you XML.prototype.methodName)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > and [[Get]] is specified in 9.1.1.1
>> >>> >
>> >>> > So I assume it is a bug. As discussed I think it is good to
>> match
>> >>> the
>> >>> > behavior. If we can verify 100% it is off spec, we could add
>> >>> something as a
>> >>> > define to avoid the 'fix' for people who want to be on-spec.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 11:30 AM Alex Harui
>> > >>> >
>> >>> > wrote

Re: Heads up on XML

2019-09-08 Thread Greg Dove 
Not quite there yet with the final changes, I'm afraid. I'm getting
close... should be tomorrow my time.


On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:32 AM Greg Dove  wrote:

>
> Yeah thanks Josh, Alex made a suggestion for that option too, it was the
> one I thought I would try first. I hope to get there later today, so I will
> see if I can figure that out.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 7:20 AM Josh Tynjala 
> wrote:
>
>> I think the DITA files generated by asdoc are pretty big too, so they're
>> probably really useful for your testing.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On Friday, September 6, 2019, Greg Dove  wrote:
>> > 'I think that SWFDump will generate valid XML and there is a way to get
>> > DITA files from Flex ASDoc that are valid XML.'
>> > Sounds like a good idea for some large xml files. I did not use that
>> yet,
>> > so will take a look and see if I can figure it out. Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:30 PM Greg Dove  wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Just to clarify I was referring to this stuff here:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/8ab1d813ee2f72bab957f9485e56ad89dcf6e1ab/frameworks/projects/MXRoyale/src/main/royale/mx/rpc/http/AbstractOperation.as#L1038
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> with '//old XML style'
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:24 PM Alex Harui 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I haven't looked at what XML is used/supported by MX HTTPService.  It
>> >>> looks like WebService does use MX HTTPService.  I am currently
>> migrating
>> >>> other things that WebService needs (XMLEncoder/Decoder,
>> >>> SOAPEncoder/Decoder).  These are new files that aren't in the repo
>> yet,
>> so
>> >>> HTTPService couldn't be relying on them or else their use is commented
>> >>> out.   The goal is to change as little as possible to get it to
>> compile
>> and
>> >>> then see if it runs.  I have no idea yet if the XML improvements you
>> are
>> >>> working on are going to be impactful on what I'm doing or not.
>> >>>
>> >>> BTW, I could be wrong, but I think that SWFDump will generate valid
>> XML
>> >>> and there is a way to get DITA files from Flex ASDoc that are valid
>> XML.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the heads up,
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> On 9/6/19, 5:14 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually I know you are looking into the WSDL stuff maybe this
>> is
>> >>> going
>> >>> to be important for that (not sure)?
>> >>> My goal is to get the XML stuff tidied up and ready to push by end
>> of
>> >>> day
>> >>> tomorrow, worst case the following morning, local time (UTC+12). I
>> >>> also
>> >>> need to find some big XML test cases to check the memory side of
>> >>> things.
>> >>> FYI there is also some XMLDocument stuff missing (commented out)
>> from
>> >>> some
>> >>> of the MX HttpService code, which came up in a recent issue. I
>> don't
>> >>> know
>> >>> if it shares any of the code from the WSDL stuff you are looking
>> at
>> or
>> >>> not...
>> >>> If it does then I don't want to double up on things, but
>> otherwise I
>> >>> will
>> >>> try to look at that on my Monday.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:02 PM Greg Dove 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Thanks for checking that.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > child is specified in 13.4.4.6 and essentially calls [[Get]]
>> >>> > (After cycling through this kind of thing a few times, I found
>> the
>> >>> easiest
>> >>> > way to find methods is to search in the spec for 'e.mehodName'
>> >>> which gets
>> >>> > you XML.prototype.methodName)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > and [[Get]] is specified in 9.1.1.1
>> >>> >
>> >>> > So I assume it is a bug. As discussed I think it is good to
>> match
>> >>> the
>> >>> > behavior. If we can verify 100% it is off spec, we could add
>> >>> something as a
>> >>> > define to avoid the 'fix' for people who want to be on-spec.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 11:30 AM Alex Harui
>> > >>> >
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> FWIW, I went and looked at the ABC.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The first syntax sets up a getProperty just like any other
>> property
>> >>> >> fetch.  The second (as expected) calls "child()".  I've looked
>> at
>> >>> the E4X
>> >>> >> spec a couple of times now and cannot see where the behavior we
>> >>> are seeing
>> >>> >> in child() is specified so I am going to assume it is a bug,
>> and
>> >>> that we
>> >>> >> just have to live with it.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I expect that getProperty does not call child().  I haven't
>> looked
>> >>> at the
>> >>> >> AVM code to see what getProperty does for XML.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> HTH,
>> >>> >> -Alex
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On 9/5/19, 12:05 PM, "Greg Dove"  wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Oh that is a good find! And perfect timing :)
>> >>> >> Thanks Alex, I am pretty sure that answers the question!
>

Jenkins build is back to normal : royale-asjs_jsonly #3519

2019-09-08 Thread Apache Royale CI Server 
See

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-08 Thread Alex Harui 
Hi Piotr,

Don't run the steps until the necessary changes have been made.

Also, don't delete the release branches as changes have been made in there that 
are not in develop.

-Alex

On 9/8/19, 2:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

I will make clean up on release branch for those folders and run stuff
again.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 9:47 AM Alex Harui  wrote:

> I ran the ApproveRoyale script.  It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> before sending out the vote emails.  The script found:
>
> Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> be, IMO.  Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> BasicJS/src/test
> CoreJS/src/test
> NetworkJS/src/test
> ReflectionJS/src/test
> RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> XMLJS/src/test
>
> This file was found by rat.  I don't think it should be in the packages or
> our repo.
> .factorypath
>
> I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> playerglobal
> The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM.  I didn't have time to
> confirm.  Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
>
> I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
>
> The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> package.  The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> folders.
> royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
>
> And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files.  Andrew can you edit both the
> top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
>
> There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
>
> I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> Should
> I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
> folders?
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala  >
> wrote:
>
> > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> with the
> > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccbf1cc34c5da40db784208d7343dcbfe%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637035312409574318&sdata=qsqMLtu%2FheSTsgTcjb%2FsTRApZL6V%2BLe%2FkxhWmdJoT7U%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I
> was
> > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare
> nice
> > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> assume.
> > -
> > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> what's in
> > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this
> RC
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> related
> > to
> > > > MX.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing,
> does
> > it
> > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> reviewing
> > stuff.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #1133

2019-09-08 Thread Apache Royale CI Server 
See 


--
[...truncated 966.61 KB...]
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ObjectUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidBorderUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringTrimmer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Timer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIUtils
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Effect
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Transition
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFill
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidColor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IExternalizable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Proxy
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CursorBookmark
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ICollectionView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IList
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IViewCursor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionViewCursor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionViewBookmark
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayCollection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayList
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: XMLListCollection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CanvasLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Flex
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BoxDirection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: HBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PanelTitleBar
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGridColumn
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Button
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ISelectable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CheckBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ComboBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ComboBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ScrollControlBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGrid
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DateField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Label
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: List
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MenuBar
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: NumericStepper
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RadioButton
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RadioButtonGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TextArea
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITextInput
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TextInput
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITextFieldFactory
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Singleton
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ItemClickEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MenuEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MouseEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PropertyChangeEventKind
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Matrix
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Matrix
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerComplexComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IResourceBundle
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceManagerImpl
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceModuleInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceEventDispatcher
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceBundleProxy
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: GroupBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SkinnableComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ButtonBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Button
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ErrorArray
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RunCodeEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PasswordInputBead
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITileLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TileLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleUtils
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringPadder
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIDUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStroke
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CursorError
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SortError
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ISort
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Sort
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IXMLNotifiable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: XMLListAdapter
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: FlexChildInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BaseListData
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFactory
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IUITextField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UITextField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CollectionEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CollectionEventKind
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleSorter
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleID
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleRegistry
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceBundle
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIDUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LayoutBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BasicLayout
[mxm

Build failed in Jenkins: royale-asjs_MXTests #1132

2019-09-08 Thread Apache Royale CI Server 
See 


Changes:

[yishayjobs] Fixes #445

[yishayjobs] Make operator precedence explicit

--
[...truncated 968.50 KB...]
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ObjectUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidBorderUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringTrimmer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Timer
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIUtils
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Effect
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Transition
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFill
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SolidColor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IExternalizable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Proxy
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CursorBookmark
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ICollectionView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IList
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IViewCursor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionView
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionViewCursor
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListCollectionViewBookmark
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayCollection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayList
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: XMLListCollection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CanvasLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Flex
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BoxDirection
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: HBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PanelTitleBar
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGridColumn
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Button
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ISelectable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CheckBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ComboBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ComboBox
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ScrollControlBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGrid
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DateField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Label
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: List
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MenuBar
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: NumericStepper
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RadioButton
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RadioButtonGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TextArea
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITextInput
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TextInput
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITextFieldFactory
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Singleton
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ItemClickEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ListEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MenuEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: MouseEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PropertyChangeEventKind
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Matrix
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Matrix
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerComplexComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFocusManagerGroup
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IResourceBundle
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceManagerImpl
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceModuleInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceEventDispatcher
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceBundleProxy
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: GroupBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SkinnableComponent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ButtonBase
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Button
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ErrorArray
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: RunCodeEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: PasswordInputBead
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ITileLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: TileLayout
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleUtils
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringPadder
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIDUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IStroke
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CursorError
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: SortError
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ISort
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: Sort
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IXMLNotifiable
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: XMLListAdapter
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: FlexChildInfo
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: BaseListData
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IFactory
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: IUITextField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UITextField
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CollectionEvent
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: CollectionEventKind
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleSorter
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleID
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: LocaleRegistry
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ResourceBundle
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: ArrayUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: StringUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: UIDUtil
[mxmlc] scanning for overrides: DataGroup
[mx

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-08 Thread Piotr Zarzycki 
Hi Andrew,

I hope you are all safe! Take care!

Thanks,
Piotr

niedz., 8 wrz 2019 o 11:24 Andrew Wetmore  napisał(a):

> We have no power until maybe Tuesday due to hurricane Dorian passing by.
> Can review the files then.
>
> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 4:47 AM Alex Harui,  wrote:
>
> > I ran the ApproveRoyale script.  It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> > before sending out the vote emails.  The script found:
> >
> > Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> > be, IMO.  Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> > BasicJS/src/test
> > CoreJS/src/test
> > NetworkJS/src/test
> > ReflectionJS/src/test
> > RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> > XMLJS/src/test
> >
> > This file was found by rat.  I don't think it should be in the packages
> or
> > our repo.
> > .factorypath
> >
> > I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> > playerglobal
> > The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM.  I didn't have time to
> > confirm.  Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
> >
> > I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
> >
> > The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> > package.  The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> > folders.
> > royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
> >
> > And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files.  Andrew can you edit both the
> > top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
> >
> > There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> > I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
> >
> > I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> > Should
> > I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files
> in
> > folders?
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> > with the
> > > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning !
> I
> > was
> > > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and
> prepare
> > nice
> > > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> > assume.
> > > -
> > > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore  >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> > what's in
> > > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > > >
> > > > > a
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for
> this
> > RC
> > > > couple
> > > > > of
> > > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> > related
> > > to
> > > > > MX.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was
> failing,
> > does
> > > it
> > > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> > reviewing
> > > stuff.
> > > > > > What
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > > >
> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-08 Thread Andrew Wetmore 
We have no power until maybe Tuesday due to hurricane Dorian passing by.
Can review the files then.

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 4:47 AM Alex Harui,  wrote:

> I ran the ApproveRoyale script.  It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> before sending out the vote emails.  The script found:
>
> Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> be, IMO.  Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> BasicJS/src/test
> CoreJS/src/test
> NetworkJS/src/test
> ReflectionJS/src/test
> RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> XMLJS/src/test
>
> This file was found by rat.  I don't think it should be in the packages or
> our repo.
> .factorypath
>
> I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> playerglobal
> The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM.  I didn't have time to
> confirm.  Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
>
> I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
>
> The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> package.  The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> folders.
> royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
>
> And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files.  Andrew can you edit both the
> top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
>
> There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
>
> I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> Should
> I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
> folders?
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala  >
> wrote:
>
> > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> with the
> > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I
> was
> > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare
> nice
> > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> assume.
> > -
> > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> what's in
> > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this
> RC
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> related
> > to
> > > > MX.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing,
> does
> > it
> > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> reviewing
> > stuff.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-08 Thread Piotr Zarzycki 
Hi Alex,

I will make clean up on release branch for those folders and run stuff
again.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019, 9:47 AM Alex Harui  wrote:

> I ran the ApproveRoyale script.  It is a good idea for the RM to run it
> before sending out the vote emails.  The script found:
>
> Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't
> be, IMO.  Some clean step is missing somewhere.
> BasicJS/src/test
> CoreJS/src/test
> NetworkJS/src/test
> ReflectionJS/src/test
> RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
> XMLJS/src/test
>
> This file was found by rat.  I don't think it should be in the packages or
> our repo.
> .factorypath
>
> I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for
> playerglobal
> The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM.  I didn't have time to
> confirm.  Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.
>
> I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years
>
> The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the
> package.  The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new
> folders.
> royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks
>
> And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files.  Andrew can you edit both the
> top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?
>
> There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but
> I'm out of time for another 15 hours or so.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:
>
> I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files.
> Should
> I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
> folders?
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala  >
> wrote:
>
> > I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes
> with the
> > things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=vm%2BN2O4dit0i7WNu0Wf29K%2BjqMPRoP4pcNkfdph6GWc%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I
> was
> > > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare
> nice
> > > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I
> assume.
> > -
> > > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about
> what's in
> > > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this
> RC
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop
> related
> > to
> > > > MX.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing,
> does
> > it
> > > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start
> reviewing
> > stuff.
> > > > > What
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserve

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC1

2019-09-08 Thread Alex Harui 
I ran the ApproveRoyale script.  It is a good idea for the RM to run it before 
sending out the vote emails.  The script found:

Generated output is in the binary package in these folders and shouldn't be, 
IMO.  Some clean step is missing somewhere.
BasicJS/src/test
CoreJS/src/test
NetworkJS/src/test
ReflectionJS/src/test
RoyaleUnitJS/src/test
XMLJS/src/test

This file was found by rat.  I don't think it should be in the packages or our 
repo.
.factorypath

I pushed to the release branch some changes to the README URLs for playerglobal
The README still says to use sudo on Mac for NPM.  I didn't have time to 
confirm.  Om, if you really think it shouldn't be in there go remove it.

I also pushed changes to the NOTICE file copyright years

The build failed because at least this one folder is missing from the package.  
The packaging scripts may need to be changed to pick up new folders.
royale-compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks

And then there is the RELEASE_NOTES files.  Andrew can you edit both the 
top-level RELEASE_NOTES.md and releasemgr/RELEASE_NOTES in royale-asjs?

There might be more if I get past the royaleunit-ant-tasks failure, but I'm out 
of time for another 15 hours or so.

HTH,
-Alex

On 9/6/19, 9:54 AM, "Andrew Wetmore"  wrote:

I have only looked at the top-level release notes and readme files. Should
I wait a day or so before digging down to look at the similar files in
folders?

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:45 PM Josh Tynjala 
wrote:

> I just updated the royale-compiler and royale-asjs release notes with the
> things that I worked on. They're in the develop branch for now.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC 

>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 9:37 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
>
> > I was thinking about that in a very brave way at the beginning ! I was
> > going to go trough commits from our last 0.9.4 release and prepare nice
> > list for CHANGELOG, but since everything took double time then I assume.
> -
> > It's not going to happen from my sight.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 5:13 PM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
> >
> > > The release notes file doesn't seem to have a section about what's in
> > > 0.9.6, the current release.
> > >
> > > a
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:29 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > IT depends on what commit MX is failing. I did branch for this RC
> > couple
> > > of
> > > > days ago. In that time I was seeing some commits to develop related
> to
> > > MX.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 4:02 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks. One question I have is: I think MX Test was failing, does
> it
> > > > > affects the release or are not crucial to get the bits out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > El vie., 6 sept. 2019 a las 13:10, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have upload manually ant artifacts. Please start reviewing
> stuff.
> > > > What
> > > > > if
> > > > > > vote passes - Should we merge 0.9.6 tag to develop ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > pt., 6 wrz 2019 o 13:09 Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > napisał(a):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccd5c799cbcb94f13f2d508d732eae327%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637033856755836697&sdata=moeir%2BOsYnCZDPkHAFbTPRhydzDnBILXP%2FZhsfVcTdc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > 
*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook