Hi Alex,
El mar., 15 ene. 2019 a las 18:44, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> IMO, we want to abstract away platform/runtime-specific implementations in
> the API surface. It is not a good idea to have our user's application rely
> on API practices that may not work on all targets. So
Hi Carlos,
IMO, we want to abstract away platform/runtime-specific implementations in the
API surface. It is not a good idea to have our user's application rely on API
practices that may not work on all targets. So first, we have to agree on what
width/height is in Royale.
I do not think
Hi Alex,
El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 18:37, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> Right now there are some places where we unset by setting width/height to
> "". I think those will have to change to "initial" but it is the same
> principle.
But changing "" to "initial" seems to me focus just in HTML
I've run into the "unset width/height" issue myself. IMO, unsetting
width/height is platform-specific and shouldn't be in the API surfaces of the
components. For me, I just had to pick the right place in the platform
implementation to set the values. Right now there are some places where we
Hi Alex,
El lun., 14 ene. 2019 a las 5:37, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
>
> NaN may not be a legal value on some runtimes/platforms.
mmm...but, right now, since property is actually NaN, you can pass NaN
value in Royale, so is a valid value actually, and I think Flex as well can
accept NaN right?
On 1/13/19, 4:12 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
*So, to refocus on the topic that open this thread. For me the decision is
about:*
*a) To use NaN in width and height, make this little change in setWidth to
be able to use NaN*
*this.positioner.style.width =
Hi Mark,
right, I was aware that I can do this in my App. But what I want to do with
this thread is to bring attention to our current "width" and "height"
implementation
I think we should have in some way or another a way to get things done in
AS3/MXML instead to go down and create and assign a
I'm slow getting to these emails, so if I've missed any, I apologize.
After this last two weeks I've come to the realization that the FlexBox CSS
style is greatly more flexible(no pun intended twice) than most of what we have
in AS. I could write a pile of examples for most common layouts if
