Re: 4.x branch for RDF4j updates.

2018-04-09 Thread Jürgen Jakobitsch
hi, my 2 cents: since this might look a little easier than it is in reality i'd give my +1 to a feature branch (4.0.0). => rather take a little more time and upgrade more deps and test thoroughly.. note that you might scare away NEW installations with old dependencies.. (when i first installed

Re: April Rya podling report draft - please comment

2018-04-09 Thread Josh Elser
A little late, but it looks good to me too. When are you submitting paperwork to graduate? :) On 4/2/18 1:54 PM, Adina Crainiceanu wrote: Hi, I started the podling report for the ASF board due Wednesday April 4th. Please review it and let me know of any recommendations/changes. I'll submit a

Re: April Rya podling report draft - please comment

2018-04-09 Thread Josh Elser
Hi Jürgen, These reports are more focused around the project's "health" with respect to its community as opposed to technical changes being made. So, it's usually not appropriate to call out specific changes which have been made. That said, if the report hasn't already been submitted (I'm

Re: 4.x branch for RDF4j updates.

2018-04-09 Thread Jeff Dasch
The simplest thing for the community is to have a single branch of development that is being supported/maintained. Otherwise we're always forward/backporting new features that apply to both versions which is a pain. I do think we should push a 3.x branch so we can always do a future 3.2.13