Hi Sophie,
we will try to fix those issues for OOo 3.1.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gao,
are you sure? When looking at the content of a saved document
I see, that the new filter conditions were written to the
file. Therefore the problem must be the import, not the
export. Nevertheless debugging your new methods in the
sc module during import is the right approach.
Thomas
Hi Gao,
gaozm wrote:
When I want to use the XSheetFilterDescriptor2(setFilterFields2() and
getFilterFields2()) in sc/source/ui/vba/vbarange.cxx file, I find a bit
difficult, so I hope you can give me some help, Thank you.
I think the strategy is the same as for those changes
you've
Hi Gao,
It's unlucky for me to find you didn't attend the IRC meeting.
I'm sorry, but I had several days off.
I sent one screenshot of testdoc to you a few days before. Can you reproduce the crash phenomenon?
No, even with your test document I cannot reproduce your crashes.
Did
Hi Gao,
you cannot simply use the type ::com::sun::star::sheet::TableFilterField2
instead of the type ::com::sun::star::sheet::TableFilterField, e.g.
as parameter for the method ScXMLExportDatabaseRanges::WriteCondition().
At that point you have to start to write code which handles the
type
Hi Gao,
please see my comments in the issue.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gao,
gaozm wrote:
Hello Thomas:
As you know that I have added three files to extend the UNO API. After I added the code to the XML import/export, there are still something wrong when compiling. Do you think whether I need add some other files to extend the UNO API?
Such as:
Hi Gao,
gaozm wrote:
Hello Thomas:
Thank you for your comments. Following your advices, I have modified the
three files. Please check it and give me some advice. Thank you! :-)
Best Regards!
Gao Zemin
please see my comments in the issue.
Thomas
Cor Nouws wrote:
Thomas Benisch wrote (17-1-2008 10:37)
Lvyue wrote:
I have combined the two code branches,
please check patch2 of i35579.
this patch is fine, thanks for this nice work.
+1 :-)
Target ??
Just to clarify. This part of the patch if fine, but the code for
exporting
Hi Gao,
gaozm wrote:
Hello Thomas:
I have added three files to extend the UNO API, please check it, do
you think whether what I do is right? If not, I hope you give me some
advice. Thank you!
adding the new IDL files is the right direction. Please see my comments
in the issue.
Thomas
Hi Lvyue,
Lvyue wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for your detailed comments in issue #35579#.
I can consolidate code by combining the SC_EQUAL ... code branch
and the SC_CONTAINS ... code branch.
But the SC_EQUAL ... code branch seems to have some connections with
other functions, I don't know
Please see my comments in issue #35579#.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Gao,
thanks for this patch. As Kohei already wrote, please attach the next
iteration of the patch to issue #35579#. In addition also the
specification needs to be updated. Although we work mainly with
specifications as odt document, Kohei is right that wiki is also an
accepted format. So it's
Hi Gao,
gaozm wrote:
The naming of the conditions doesn't seem to be the best choice, but Frank
Loehmann will have a look at this issue and will propose some better names.
I think we should wait for Frank Loehmann's reply, right?
yes, for the final naming you should wait for Frank's reply.
In yesterday's Calc usability meeting we had some discussion about
the specification. Let me summarize the current status.
1.1 New filter conditions
All agreed that we want to have the additional filter conditions.
The naming of the conditions doesn't seem to be the best choice,
but Frank
4.) RooT = R-OpenOfiice Tool
4') ROOT
I personally disfavor this one, as ROOT is a well-known data analysis
tool used in particle physics.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Please note, that I updated the specification at
http://specs.openoffice.org/calc/ease-of-use/Enhanced_Formula_Input.odt
Although the question which user input is converted into a formula
is quite controversial, I tried to include the most important comments
into the specification.
In a
Hi Muthu,
Have you tried the patch that I have attached (in issue 20496)?
as I have issue #20496 on my list I propose that I will have a look
at the patch, probably in a few days.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi Eike,
the examples in the spec basically follow the Excel behavior.
You made some good points and it seems, that the Excel behavior
is not always wanted. Unfortunately Frank is on vacation until
end of August, but the specification definitely needs to be
reworked.
From an implementation
PA Galmes wrote:
There is no link to a sepc, is it missing?
The iTeam agreed, that this change doesn't need a specification.
All necessary information is available in the feature announcement.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe,
PA Galmes wrote:
Not all of the feature is accessible through menus/right-click. For
example, the sections:
1.3.2.1 Insert Move DD to Same Row/Column
1.4 Insert Move Drop of Whole Columns in Same Table
do not currently work using what you described, or am I wrong?
No, you're right. The
PA Galmes wrote:
Thus, I think that the paste special behavior should be adapted to
reflect your changes as obviously, they are what user expects.
Should we create an issue for that ?
Yes, you can write an issue. Please see also issues
#21280 Automatic Insert (shift down or shift right) of
PA Galmes wrote:
Hello,
I just read the new spec for inserting data in OOo (Insertion of
Cells in a Spreadsheet via Drag Drop).
*Specification URL*
---
http://specs.openoffice.org/calc/ease-of-use/Insertion_of_Cells.odt
This new feature is based on the use of the DD and the
PA Galmes wrote:
On 6/4/07, Thomas Benisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PA Galmes wrote:
- What about selections with cells removed (ex : A1:D10
intersection C5)
There's no special handling of such cases yet.
I don't know which behaviour should be chosed. What do you think would
PA Galmes wrote:
Some more points to think about:
- What about multi-selection using ctrl (ex 1: A2:A4 + D3:D5) ?
- Will OOo calculate the result for each line/column?
Yes, the result will be calculated for each selection separately.
In your example the first result will be inserted into A5,
25 matches
Mail list logo
