Hi Regina,
On Monday, 2009-04-13 22:42:07 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
besides the UI-name problem I come across two other questions.
For clarification: we're talking about ODF FDIST here, as opposed to
LEGACY.FDIST
(1)
If the numerator degrees of freedom (r1) is 1, then the density
Hi,
On Sunday, 2009-04-19 20:35:09 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
I can set the result to 0 or set illegal argument or perhaps set
infinity. Please decide.
I think letting the calculation just run into an error the same as
occurs for the expression =0^-1 in ScInterpreter::ScExp() is fine,
Hi,
besides the UI-name problem I come across two other questions.
(1)
If the numerator degrees of freedom (r1) is 1, then the density function
has a pole at x=0. The draft spec does not define the return value in
that case. For x0 it defines that the return value is 0. For x=0 it
defines it
