[sc-dev] Re: [allsvn] r265030 - cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet
On 12/08/08 19:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/FormulaLanguage.idl == --- cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/FormulaLanguage.idl Mon Dec 8 18:33:06 2008(r265029) +++ cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/FormulaLanguage.idl Mon Dec 8 18:33:13 2008(r265030) @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ */ const long NATIVE = 3; +/** Function names and operators as used in the English version of +Excel. This formula language is also used in VBA formulas and +OOXML import/export. + */ +const long XL_ENGLISH = 4; }; No, the map of Excel function names is supposed to be part of the Excel filter, and that's how the import already works. Niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] Re: [allsvn] r265030 - cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet
On 12/08/08 20:17, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:05 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote: No, the map of Excel function names is supposed to be part of the Excel filter, and that's how the import already works. But what's the drawback? Defining a formula language here makes it easier to use in the filters as well as VBA formula parsing since it fits nicely in the current grammar framework. To me, not doing this would be a kludge. Again, modularization. We want to separate the Excel filter from the sc module, and opcode mapping is part of it. Niklas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [sc-dev] Re: [allsvn] r265030 - cws/ooxml02/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:43 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote: On 12/08/08 20:17, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 20:05 +0100, Niklas Nebel wrote: No, the map of Excel function names is supposed to be part of the Excel filter, and that's how the import already works. But what's the drawback? Defining a formula language here makes it easier to use in the filters as well as VBA formula parsing since it fits nicely in the current grammar framework. To me, not doing this would be a kludge. Again, modularization. We want to separate the Excel filter from the sc module, and opcode mapping is part of it. But VBA is not part of the filter, and we need that for VBA. The filter is merely re-using it. There is a fine line between modularization and reusability. Kohei - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-dev] Copy/paste from Calc to writer
Hi list-members, Where is the code which creates the OLE object when I copy cells from a sheet and paste them into Writer? Thanks, Alan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
