Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-11-22 Thread Sergio Pena
Thanks Kalyan. Those JIRAs are committed now and the 2.0 release is not blocked anymore. You may want to cut the branch now to freeze the 2.0 version. - Sergio On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I have started the release process. As

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-11-22 Thread Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda
I have started the release process. As initial step I have moved all the unresolved jira's to 2.1.0 release except for SENTRY-2062 and SENTRY-1812. Please let me know if you want your changes to be part of sentry 2.0.0. I will be cutting branch for sentry 2.0.0 later today. -Kalyan On Mon, Oct

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-16 Thread Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda
I feel, we should stop using the terms authz1 and authz2 now on as it can create confusion.. With the new approach we have taken there is no authz1. Sentry binding that will be enabled by default uses functionality of both older bindings. -Kalyan On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Sergio Pena

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-16 Thread Sergio Pena
I won't be necessary to have both binding jars. But we will keep the code around for one more release and remove it later just as backup for us in case we forgot to refactor something. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Sounds good thanks. Just

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-16 Thread Sergio Pena
Nop. The plan is to ship authz2 but only when grant/revoke tasks are executed and HMS filters are used. The current HiveAuthzBinding class will still be used when a command is executed and Hive requests authorization to Sentry (this is part of the authz1 profile). Btw, the HMS server side checks

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-16 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Sergio, Is the plan to ship both the authz1 and authz2 bindings for Sentry 2.0.0? If so, which is recommended for use? Also, what are the plans to get a more recent version of Solr supported? Colm. On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Na Li wrote: > Kalyan, > > Thanks for

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-13 Thread Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda
Sasha, See my response in-line below -Kalyan On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Alexander Kolbasov wrote: > Kalyan, > > Thank you for pushing forward 2.0 release! > > > On Oct 13, 2017, at 7:20 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda < > kkal...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > Hello all, >

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-13 Thread Sergio Pena
Thanks Kalyan. I like the proposal. The original idea was to switch to hive-authz2 on Sentry 2.0, but we can have this mix for now. It won't be incompatible to switch completely to checkPrivileges() in the future once we understand hive and sentry relationship on this area. +1 On Fri, Oct 13,

Re: Proposal to release Sentry 2.0.0

2017-10-13 Thread Alexander Kolbasov
Kalyan, Thank you for pushing forward 2.0 release! > On Oct 13, 2017, at 7:20 AM, Kalyan Kumar Kalvagadda > wrote: > > Hello all, > > We need to release sentry HA functionality so that community can start > using it. In this regard I proposed to have a sentry 1.9.0