Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

2018-08-14 Thread wjm wjm
1.fork jackson-dataformats-binary to https://github.com/huaweicse 2.PR from huaweicse to jackson 3.deploy a special version jackson-dataformat-protobuf from huaweicse to huawei cse maven repository 4.before our features set be stable, we will depend jackson-dataformat-protobuf from huawei cse

Re: Support dotnet sniffer for incubator-servicecomb-saga

2018-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Lin I pinged Skywalking guy, they have a separated git group which is not part of Apache to host the agent code. Can you share the status of the porting with us in the mailing list? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 12:00 AM, With Lin wrote: > ok,

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

2018-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
PMC means the ServiceComb PPMC, not the Jackson PMC. So please share your plan and modification with us, and we will find out the best way then. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:37 AM, wjm wjm wrote: > seems that: > 1.base code not change license >

Performance tuning of ServiceComb Saga Pack

2018-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi, With the help of JuZheng[1][2], we managed to deploy the saga-spring-demo into K8s and start the Jmeter tests for it. By running the test for a while, the DB CPU usage is very high and the response time is up 2~3 seconds per call. It looks like all the event are stored into the database in

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

2018-08-14 Thread Willem Jiang
If we write the code from scratch, we should apply the ASF license header. If there are third party code was add to the repo, we need to keep the old license header. Please go through this document[1] for more information. [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party Willem Jiang

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

2018-08-14 Thread wjm wjm
if create a module in our repo, then how to process the license? follow jackson or us? is it different between base code and new code. 2018-08-15 6:06 GMT+08:00 Willem Jiang : > The best way is we send the PR jackson master branch, it can benefit all of > us. > > It depends on the release time

Re: [DISCUSS] about extend jackson

2018-08-14 Thread wjm wjm
another information: jackson master version is 3.x modification for 2.9.6 is different to 3.x, many jackson base class changed 2018-08-15 2:33 GMT+08:00 wjm wjm : > i had already extend jackson protobuf to support protobuf3 map feature. > > based on jackson 2.9.6, because we are using 2.9.6 >

[DISCUSS] about extend jackson

2018-08-14 Thread wjm wjm
i had already extend jackson protobuf to support protobuf3 map feature. based on jackson 2.9.6, because we are using 2.9.6 but jackson 2.9.6 already released. even i raise a PR for this and jackson will merge it, we can not use it directly or must wait for next release. but we must start new