On 6/2/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A set of artifacts for Shale 1.0.5 is now ready. Please review the
artifacts mentioned below and vote accordingly. Since this is my first
time as release manager I wouldn't be surprised if something is
missing or if I've included things that
On 6/4/08, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008
Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that
notice.txt,
manifest.mf and
On 6/5/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) The *test* artifacts aren't meant to be distributed via releases,
or used for anything beyond local testing, IIRC. (the usecases apps
are meant to demo features). I
Greg,
I may be getting ahead of the processes, but below is what I have tested
with My applications.
+1 for shale-dialog-basic
+1 for shale-dialog-scxml
-1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008
Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008
Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that notice.txt,
manifest.mf and license.txt existed
I'll have a look at that.
The artifact
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008
Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that notice.txt,
manifest.mf and license.txt existed
Probably needs to be fixed, though I could
A set of artifacts for Shale 1.0.5 is now ready. Please review the
artifacts mentioned below and vote accordingly. Since this is my first
time as release manager I wouldn't be surprised if something is
missing or if I've included things that shouldn't be included, so I'd
appreciate as thorough a
