I just noticed another thing - theres some JavaScript files which are
being distributed as part of the Cobertura documentation
(sortabletable.js, stringbuilder.js and customsorttypes.js) which
have two different licenses (GPL, plus others). Looks to me like there
should at least be an
On 1/5/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
What should also happen here is attribution in the NOTICE.txt file for
shale-tiger module too ... I'll look into the appropriate wording for that
and commit something soon.
snap/
OK, I will be cutting the new artifacts in ~8 hours
On 1/4/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/5/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
What should also happen here is attribution in the NOTICE.txt file for
shale-tiger module too ... I'll look into the appropriate wording for
that
and commit something soon.
snap/
On 1/2/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review these artifacts, signatures and checksums, and vote
whether we should release them as Apache Shale version 1.0.4.
--8
[X] +1 (Binding) for PMC members only
[ ] +1 for community members
On 1/2/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
org.apache.shale:shale-apps-parent:1.0.4
As part of my review of the proposed 1.0.4 release (all the sigs match ...
but let's see what happens when I try to *use* this stuff :-), I want to try
building our distribution artifacts. I could
