Just a question: are you keeping good notes as to what you're
doing? I'd like for the details of the process to end up on a wiki
page if they are not already there. After reading these messages I
have no clue what you are doing :-)
Greg
On Dec 19, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Rahul Akolkar
On 12/20/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a question: are you keeping good notes as to what you're
doing? I'd like for the details of the process to end up on a wiki
page if they are not already there. After reading these messages I
have no clue what you are doing :-)
snip/
On 12/19/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/19/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
OK, if everyone's fine with that, I will create the 1.0 branch (called
SHALE_1_0_x unless there are better suggestions) when we get closer to
the release (after all 1.0.4-SNAP
On 12/20/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 12/19/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have a mild preference for naming the branch SHALE_1_0 but
I'm not
going to choke if we go with what you proposed either. I'm
On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
* Since the trunk is being continuously built by Continuum,
trying to do our release cutting there (including removing
SNAPSHOT from the version numbers) would cause Continuum
to publish a release, with the real version number, before
we
On 12/20/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
* Since the trunk is being continuously built by Continuum,
trying to do our release cutting there (including removing
SNAPSHOT from the version numbers) would cause Continuum
to
On Dec 20, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 12/20/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the first thing we'd do when we decide to release is - after
finishing up business - start a branch for the release. Then we
work
On 12/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like reasonable things to do :-) We even have a staging repo
defined in the master pom (thanks Wendy) which we should use for this.
By default if the version doesn't end in -SNAPSHOT,
On 12/19/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like reasonable things to do :-) We even have a staging repo
defined in the master pom (thanks Wendy) which we should use for
