I think there is no rule in ASF side. I am not sure, whether tar.gz is
friendly to Window user or not?
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
kezhenxu94 于2019年11月19日周二 下午3:26写道：
> If the ASF doesn't require two formats of distribution packages,
> I myself prefer option 2, distributing only one
I prefer Option2.
Daming(@dmsolr)
Apache SkyWalking
> 在 2019年11月19日，上午9:58，Sheng Wu 写道：
>
> Anyone has preferred?
>
> The old side fact of having both is making the release process slower,
> which is mostly my work only today.
> If not, we may just keep what we have today?
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
Anyone has preferred?
The old side fact of having both is making the release process slower,
which is mostly my work only today.
If not, we may just keep what we have today?
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
kezhenxu94 于2019年11月17日周日 下午11:48写道：
> Do we also want to discuss keeping only one
Do we also want to discuss keeping only one format for the original
distribution packages too? If yes, then it’s a typo:
Option 1, distribution packages are:
apache-skywalking-apm-bin.tar.gz OR apache-skywalking-apm-bin.zip
apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz OR
Zhenxu Ke
I think Option 1 has a typo? Should both are OR?
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
kezhenxu94 于2019年11月17日周日 下午11:14写道：
> Hi the SkyWalking Community, I've opened a pull request[1]
> to support ElasticSearch 7 as backend storage, it assembles another
> distribution package
>
Hi the SkyWalking Community, I've opened a pull request[1]
to support ElasticSearch 7 as backend storage, it assembles another
distribution package
`apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz/apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.zip`
along with the existed
