Re: The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-16 Thread Hongtao Gao
This's a valuable discussion, but I think we can reach a conclusion in a short time. My personal preference is not to require more than one viewer for *EVERY* PR. For example, if I tweak a single line of the config file in one PR, I don't want to wait for 2 reviews to help me with it. But the

Re: The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-16 Thread Willem Jiang
It's a good practice to share the ownership of the project. If the code can be reviewed by multiple eyes, the code quality will not be an issue. BTW, if you keep an eye on the PR, you will not be surprised when you try to do some modifications on the code :) +1 to invite more people to review the

Re: The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-16 Thread Daming
Hi, I agree with him more. No matter what, I will participate in the review more actively. -- Daming(@dmsolr) Apache SkyWalking > 在 2020年2月16日,上午11:48,Sheng Wu 写道: > > More importantly, I want to share the idea. > > Don't have to wait for me to express what is my idea. I just

Re: The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-15 Thread Sheng Wu
More importantly, I want to share the idea. Don't have to wait for me to express what is my idea. I just knew and took part in the project from day one, nothing more. If more people want to take part in and make decisions, let's do it. If currently, PMC and committer still think it is better to

Re: The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-15 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi In this discussion, I didn't start to think about the rules of GitHub. That is another discussion. As we know, in the community, people sometimes prefer contributing based on their own interests, rather than reviewing others. There is not a right or wrong thing. Please consider this just as a

Re:The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-15 Thread kezhenxu94
The more reviewers, the better, but forcing it to be **REQUIRED** just doesn't make things better, IMO, it slows down the contribution process, people who take less part in reviewing works won't take more after the setting. But as you called for more committers/PMC to take part in reviewing, we

Re: The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-15 Thread Jian Tan
As I asked before, I hope there will be more approvers to review. For me, I'd love to participate. Jian Tan, both.

The possibility of requiring two approvers for every PR

2020-02-15 Thread Sheng Wu
Hi Dev and committer team Since today, we have 207 contributors in our main repo. And many PRs landed every week, which have to be approved by one person. But with the increasement of the committer and the community, I want to ask your opinion about Do we need to set up the rule for the main