Re: [slf4j-dev] Consolidating the LoggerFactory / A better plugin mechanism

2007-02-16 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 2/16/07, Eric Crahen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm fine with it just picking the first one, but certainly when there is more than one a very, very clear error message should be output that tells a user exactly what is wrong and what to do. I've seen a couple of legitimate cases where

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r726 - in slf4j/trunk: slf4j-api slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl slf4j-jcl/src/main/java/org/slf4j slf4j-jdk14/src/main/java/org/slf4j

2007-02-16 Thread seb
Author: seb Date: Fri Feb 16 19:27:16 2007 New Revision: 726 Added: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/LoggerFactory.java slf4j/trunk/slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/ slf4j/trunk/slf4j-api/src/main/java/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.java Removed:

[slf4j-dev] Follow-up to Rearranging classes

2007-02-16 Thread Sebastien Pennec
Hello all, I've just committed some changes about the LoggerFactory class. Now, the api module contains the LoggerFactory class, it is not present in the other modules anymore. It also contains a dummy StaticLoggerBinder implementation to make sure it compiles nicely. This dummy class is

Re: [slf4j-dev] Follow-up to Rearranging classes

2007-02-16 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 07:32 PM 2/16/2007, Sebastien Pennec wrote: Hello all, I've just committed some changes about the LoggerFactory class. Now, the api module contains the LoggerFactory class, it is not present in the other modules anymore. It also contains a dummy StaticLoggerBinder implementation to make

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r727 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jcl

2007-02-16 Thread jconlon
Author: jconlon Date: Fri Feb 16 21:42:47 2007 New Revision: 727 Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jcl/pom.xml Log: Added the new org.slf4j.helpers as a private package to the bundle. Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jcl/pom.xml

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r728 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jdk14

2007-02-16 Thread jconlon
Author: jconlon Date: Fri Feb 16 21:43:52 2007 New Revision: 728 Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jdk14/pom.xml Log: Added the new org.slf4j.helpers as a private package to the bundle. Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-jdk14/pom.xml

[slf4j-dev] [Bug 23] bogus jcl-over-slf4j impl - %F, %L etc. off by one

2007-02-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
show_bug.cgi?id=23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r731 - slf4j/trunk/slf4j-simple

2007-02-16 Thread jconlon
Author: jconlon Date: Fri Feb 16 21:48:36 2007 New Revision: 731 Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-simple/pom.xml Log: Added the new org.slf4j.helpers as a private package to the bundle. Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-simple/pom.xml

[slf4j-dev] svn commit: r732 - slf4j/trunk

2007-02-16 Thread jconlon
Author: jconlon Date: Fri Feb 16 22:03:05 2007 New Revision: 732 Modified: slf4j/trunk/pom.xml Log: Added profile for building and testing OSGi projects. Modified: slf4j/trunk/pom.xml == --- slf4j/trunk/pom.xml

Re: [slf4j-dev] jcl-over-slf4j module not building

2007-02-16 Thread John E. Conlon
Your right, neither do I want to increase the number of classes in the org.slf4j packages. But we are basically doing the same kind of thing with the second approach as well - exposing our selves to greater coupling by clients. By exporting the org.slf4j.spi package we are exporting what was