The vote passed with 3 binding votes, thx for voting!
I'll do the same procedure as every time and push the releases.
Cheers,
Stefan
On 26/09/16 12:08, "Stefan Egli" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We solved 4 issues in these 2 related releases:
>
gt;-Original Message-
>>From: Stefan Egli [mailto:stefane...@apache.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:43 AM
>>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Discovery Commons 1.0.16 and
>>Discovery Oak 1.2.14
>>
>>Hi St
org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Discovery Commons 1.0.16 and
>Discovery Oak 1.2.14
>
>Hi Stefan,
>
>Good point, it should probably be 1.1.0. So it is considered a violation
>of semantic versioning the way I've done it now?
>
>(Two points: discover
l Message-
>>From: Stefan Egli [mailto:stefane...@apache.org]
>>Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 12:09 PM
>>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>>Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Sling Discovery Commons 1.0.16 and
>>Discovery Oak 1.2.14
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>W
TE] Release Apache Sling Discovery Commons 1.0.16 and
>Discovery Oak 1.2.14
>
>Hi,
>
>We solved 4 issues in these 2 related releases:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338296
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforvers
+1
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Egli wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> On 26/09/16 12:08, "Stefan Egli" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >We solved 4 issues in these 2 related releases:
> >
>
+1
Cheers,
Stefan
On 26/09/16 12:08, "Stefan Egli" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We solved 4 issues in these 2 related releases:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338296
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338297
>
>Staging
Hi,
We solved 4 issues in these 2 related releases:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338296
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING/fixforversion/12338297
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesling-1526
You can use this