Re: Ref guide issue

2024-04-27 Thread Houston Putman
The ref guide gets built nightly by a jenkins job. Either the job isnt working or we just need to wait till the next build. “Beta” is used when the release branch exists but the release wizard step of updating the antora.yaml (after the release is done) has not been done (or is waiting on the nigh

Ref guide issue

2024-04-27 Thread Gus Heck
I was about to send announcement emails for 9.6 but then I discovered that somehow the ref guide didn't seem to get the right version, and isn't quite working... It lists a 9.6-beta version, which I had noted this 9.6-beta at one point but I assumed that since I had never typed the word "beta" anyw

Re: [CONF] Solr > ReleaseNote9_6_0

2024-04-27 Thread Gus Heck
I guess it's pretty easy to fix though. I'll do it. On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 8:14 PM Gus Heck wrote: > Are these clarifications critical? I have already passed the step where I > copy the collaboration in the wiki into the site (I removed the jira > numbers for that since they weren't on prior ve

Fwd: [CONF] Solr > ReleaseNote9_6_0

2024-04-27 Thread Gus Heck
Are these clarifications critical? I have already passed the step where I copy the collaboration in the wiki into the site (I removed the jira numbers for that since they weren't on prior versions) -- Forwarded message - From: David Smiley (Confluence) Date: Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 8

Guide page in solr-site

2024-04-27 Thread Gus Heck
After some confusion, I think I have determined that the file in the html site repo called guide.md is actually pointless now because of this commit: https://github.com/apache/solr-site/commit/b035a8a695facaa9065341fdc2b40bfcecdc3350 Maybe it should be emptied out or even removed. There's a vague

Re: Tracking contributors uniquely

2024-04-27 Thread Jan Høydahl
> A script to use git commit data to help create CHANGES entries (or look > for CHANGES entries that are missing credit) seems like a good sanity > check to ensuring nothing trivial is overlooked in CHANGES. That's an interesting idea. Not to add CHANGES entries for the smallest ref-guide typo.

Re: Tracking contributors uniquely

2024-04-27 Thread Eric Pugh
I’d like to have both committers and contributers included, not just contributors. If it’s just contributors, and the list is short, then it may appear we have a very small community ;-). I do like the idea of thanking folks! > On Apr 26, 2024, at 9:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > > : LO