http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 17:44 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting failed sanity check on some
messages
From the MS socket documentation:
The semantics of closesocket are affected by the socket
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 18:57 ---
Loren, thanks, it looked promising, but adding a call to shutdown before the
close did not help :-(
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3944
Summary: get_envelope_from not handling received header
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: major
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 00:58 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting failed sanity check on some messages
I was more thinking of making sure that SO_LINGER is set correctly. This
really sounds
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 04:16 ---
sleep(5) between the call to shutdown and the close doesn't help at all.
I added a -l option to the call to spamc -x to see the error. Tthe results are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 04:28 ---
Subject: Re: SpamC is reporting failed sanity check on some messages
But here's kicker. I tested using the first 39166 bytes of the message of
the
first test.
Hello, Dev!
I love spamassasin, but I hate this:
X-Spam-Status: SpamAssassin Failed
I look to the log file, to the debug, soo at all, but I can`t find
anything!
What can give this error?
I ask about this error in users list, but...
--
Orlov Alexandr,
Head of IT, IPB Russia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandr Orlov wrote:
X-Spam-Status: SpamAssassin Failed
It does not appear anywhere within the SpamAssassin source code.
Googling for that exact header showed up a number of messages with it,
all spam. At first I thought it must be a fake header added by some
spammers to try to fool
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3945
Summary: HITS replacement is no longer sortable
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3945
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3225
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 08:55 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: Bayes optimizations
Indeed, after a little analysis it looks like we might come out ahead
(by reducing the number of queries by half or more)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3946
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3945
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 09:42 ---
Subject: Re: HITS replacement is no longer sortable
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 08:55:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
steve: thanks for the dup pointer! :)
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3947
Summary: SPF failure scores too low
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 09:53 ---
hm
have you guys got virus scanners installed? might they do something to bad
content being sent over 127.0.0.1?
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:30 ---
I did recently install XP Service pack 2 and it has been interacting badly with
lots of things... How about if I format my disk, install linux and see how
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:41 ---
Is XP SP2 Firewall enabled?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3946
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:41 ---
Subject: Re: I need to be able to send email.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 10:29:43AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Start by attaching a copy of one of these
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3946
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:45 ---
Excuse me? So it's wrong for me to attempt to help this poor fella out by
telling him the proper way to ask for help?
Sure he might have a problem with some
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3648
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:53 ---
Bob,
Either this issue has already been resolved or I am unable to reproduce the
error. Using notepad I created a new file with just 1 rule linted and no
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3946
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 10:57 ---
Subject: Re: I need to be able to send email.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 10:45:32AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me? So it's wrong for me to attempt to
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3946
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 11:57 ---
Fred, thanks for helping out. With bug reports similar to this one,
sometimes it is appropriate to redirect people to the mailing list
for help. It would also
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3828
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-02 12:33 ---
quick note that i'm seeing on this patch. a low timeout (ie 1-90 seconds) will
timeout a child running a bayes auto-expire almost every time since the auto-
23 matches
Mail list logo
