http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4307
Summary: RFE: use Rosetta to do translations
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2845 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 16:51 ---
'All I had to do was have HTML.pm conditionalize its one use of the
conf parameter on $self-{main} being a ref. That assumes that when parse is
being called as a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4308
Summary: not all spamd options are documented in SYNOPSIS
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 17:41 ---
I don't like the idea of having two different behaviours depending on
how the message object is created...
That's what's bothering me about this. The issue for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 18:33 ---
Some installations use multiple perl threads, each of which creates a
Mail::SpamAssassin object. Beware of breaking thread safety.
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 18:37 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yep, you're right --
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2846 is|0 |1
obsolete|
--- start of cut text --
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: .apache Freenode cloaks available
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.community
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 15:09:41 -0700
If are an ASF committer and use Freenode on IRC and want a username cloak,
please feel free
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 19:55 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 07:23:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch includes
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:41:11AM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
we don't currently do that. but that may be a good option, actually!
allow url_to_domain to return 1 datum, and query all of them.
What would be the point of uri_to_domain then? Just split on . and do it.
However, most of the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 20:31 ---
Theo,
There's a lot of stuff in the comments here. I want to make sure that your vote
is about what ended in the patch and not about things I only talked about
I'd be okay just adding the functionality to the URIDNSBL plugin for now.
Alternately, a separate plugin or doing it in get_uri_list().
It might be better to add a new plugin API that could be called from the
URIDNSBL plugin or any other place that wants it.
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 20:35 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector
I'd be okay just adding the functionality to the URIDNSBL plugin for now.
Alternately, a
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What would be the point of uri_to_domain then? Just split on . and do it.
A bit of hyperbole there, I think.
A uri_to_domains could return a longer list including less common
transforms. The number of SURBL listings affected is almost zero,
though.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4308
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.1.0
--- You are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 20:48 ---
How would the new plugin API work? Is the idea that URIs are extracterd and
deobfuscated in HTML.pm and later the URIs can be passed to a plugin to be
checked for
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 22:14 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-05 10:37 ---
the spamc part is nearly
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4305
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2842 is|0 |1
obsolete|
That is all.
(I will probably build the release this weekend.)
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |dev@spamassassin.apache.org
---
On Thursday, May 5, 2005, 11:41:11 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
John Gardiner Myers writes:
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
We can't just add them willy-nilly.
Why not? Treat them like .us -- do two queries.
we don't currently do that. but that may be a good option, actually!
allow url_to_domain
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4309
Summary: Spamc/d should log memory and message-id after
processing
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4153
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 04:41 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE : Spamc patch for config file
First major question : should the global config file override user
command-line
options?
Thinking
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4156
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 04:52 ---
Sorry for the delay, bugzilla slipped under the radar for a bit.
Will pursue submitting a CLA and advise. In the mean time, you're welcome to
play with it in
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 05:29 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 03:26 ---
As I consider this
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 06:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=2849)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2849action=view)
First throw of ListsReport for spamc part
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 06:54 ---
Learning either as spam for reporting or as ham for revoking is just how that
code works.
Okay, for me learning is always a learn to bayesian. So, I think we've
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 07:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=2850)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2850action=view)
Second throw
forgot to implement exclusion!
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2849 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 07:13 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 06:54 ---
Learning either as spam
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 07:34 ---
Thanks Michael,
now I know why you want the learning combined with reporting. I didn't ever use
the spamassassin command. So it wasn't clear to me that a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Chan writes:
On Thursday, May 5, 2005, 11:41:11 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
That list does currently have some non-country code domains like:
eu.org
au.com
br.com
cn.com
de.com
de.net
eu.com
[...]
Is SpamAssassin using that list? If
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4309
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 10:23 ---
message-id: +1. I really agree this is a good plan.
memory size: not so easy -- we can't actually get that info reliably on all
platforms :(
awl/bayes: it
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4309
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 10:36 ---
Subject: Re: Spamc/d should log memory and message-id after processing
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:23:48AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
message-id: +1. I
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4309
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 10:53 ---
I think the idea is to log the Message-ID on errors and warns, too.
that way the log that now contains:
spamd [5304]: 30 second timeout while trying to CHECK
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2850 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.1.0
--- Additional
Anyone know why this isn't a good change? or why it was set to 1 in
the first place? (revoke has it set to 0)
Index: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm
===
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm (revision 168612)
+++
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 12:28 ---
There are a couple of issues with the tests, one spamc doesn't return anything
in the failure case, fixed in an upcoming patch, Reporter.pm defaults to
everything
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 13:12 ---
I see a basic design issue here. Going all the way back to the spamassasssin
script, processing looks like this, as a rough outline:
$mail =
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 01:42:59PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
Anyone know why this isn't a good change? or why it was set to 1 in
the first place? (revoke has it set to 0)
Hrm. I think that's a left over from changing things around when moving
things to plugins. I can't think of a reason
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 13:38 ---
Much better idea for the t/spamc_optC.t test, I'll just create a quick reporter
plugin, then we'll turn everything off and just use that plugin to test the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4196
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 14:04 ---
I re-read the permsgstatus docs and didn't notice that bit about only returning
the first entry before, which is the behavior exhibited by To and Cc.
I don't
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4196
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310
Summary: spamd stops responding to new connections
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:01 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, moving that code to a check()-time
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:12 ---
ick -- that looks like Daniel's hang bug (which was fixed). What *is* in the
log? can you rerun with debugs on?
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:12 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: please add pattern for nate.com redirector
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:21:07AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, just got back
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:14 ---
also, what's the platform? worth noting I'm running it live on my linux 2.4.25
server here without any hangs noted...
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:15 ---
Subject: Re: spamd stops responding to new connections
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:14:02PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also, what's the platform? worth
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:45 ---
Subject: Re: spamd stops responding to new connections
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:12:23PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ick -- that looks like Daniel's hang
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4310
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-06 15:56 ---
'I see we stopped logging child states'
yes, that's annoying. I think Daniel changed it to be an info(), which isn't
logged. that seems pretty crappy, since I
53 matches
Mail list logo
