https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6838
--- Comment #17 from Jarkko j...@wippies.com ---
Created attachment 5092
-- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5092action=edit
Warn only with the verbose option
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6782
Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6823
Henrik Krohns h...@hege.li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6838
--- Comment #18 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
Comment on attachment 5092
-- https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5092
Warn only with the verbose option
It's certainly the right line of code and
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- Comment #6 from AXB axb.li...@gmail.com ---
SO/O speaks for not changing anything.
but I'm wokring on changes that will reflect less overlap and if there are a
FPs on a 10 year old MUA which is now considered ratware then we can
On 9/26/2012 6:43 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I recently got a false positive largely due to this rule:
* 3.0 SUBJ_YOUR_DEBT Subject contains Your Bills or similar
I think it's interesting that a rule can get scored so high when it hits
more ham than spam:
MSECSSPAM%
On 09/27/2012 01:51 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/26/2012 6:43 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I recently got a false positive largely due to this rule:
* 3.0 SUBJ_YOUR_DEBT Subject contains Your Bills or similar
I think it's interesting that a rule can get scored so high when
On 9/27/2012 8:01 AM, Axb wrote:
header SUBJ_YOUR_DEBT Subject =~ /Your (?:Bills|Debt|Credit)/i
score SUBJ_YOUR_DEBT 3.299 3.045 1.199 0.987
It is in the non sandbox rules files and also in the 10_force_active.cf.
I'm thinking that the force active should be removed and/or the rule
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@ir.bbn.com
[replying to dev@ to avoid bugspam]
--- Comment #3 from Greg Troxelg...@ir.bbn.com ---
I checked an apache server that listens on both v4 and v6 and the config file
has
Listen 0.0.0.0:80
Listen [::]:80
So I don't follow single bind. (I suspect that on systems that have v6only
set to 0,
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- Comment #7 from Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
We'll check FSL_UA / FSL_XM_419
AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 is autogenerated
These rules are basically dead safe to
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
AXB axb.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 09/27/2012 04:27 PM, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
AXB axb.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
Good comment on listserv from John Wilcock:
The documentation for apache's Listen directive is actually very helpful in
explaining the situation with regard to IPv4-mapped IPv6
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6439
Rob Janssen pe1...@amsat.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe1...@amsat.org
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
--- Comment #5 from Dan Mahoney sab...@gushi.org ---
Greg, on the other hand, on my machine (FreeBSD by the way), with apache:
%cd /usr/local/etc/apache22
%grep -Ri listen *
httpd-webmail.conf:Listen 149.20.61.46:80
17 matches
Mail list logo
