https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6872
--- Comment #4 from Todd Rinaldo to...@cpanel.net ---
If Net::DNS will not be putting the quotes back, It seems like this patch would
do well to go into a 3.3.3 branch with only this fix to be released to CPAN. Is
this in the works?
Brett,
Bringing this to the dev list for SA as well. My reaction is that I
checked and those two tab rules haven't hit on my servers in over 60
days so it doesn't warrant much of a score.
I recommend you consider locally scoring these two rules lower such as
0.5 in the meantime.
Henrik,
On 12/10/2012 2:00 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
20121209: Spam: 466126, Ham:
On 12/10/2012 03:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/10/2012 2:00 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update
On 12/10, Axb wrote:
On 12/10/2012 03:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/10/2012 2:00 AM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6874
Bug ID: 6874
Summary: HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP hitting
ham
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6875
Bug ID: 6875
Summary: User with Zmailer getting flagged for TAB_IN_FROM and
KB_FROM_CONTAINS_TAB
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6875
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6874
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 12/10/2012 06:34 PM, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6875
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/10/2012 4:44 PM, Axb wrote:
Why isn't Zmailer dev requested to fix it?
I don't even know what zmailer is ;-)
Lowering our defenses for software which hardly anybody uses anymore
and which hasn't seen a release since 2007?
(ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/src/)
I didn't consider
://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/src/)
I didn't consider it an issue since I couldn't find any hits with the
rules in my corpora. Do you ever have it fire? Otherwise, it's a rule
that has an S/O of 0 hitting only on Hams.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20121210-r1419267-n/TAB_IN_FROM/detail
hitting
a release since 2007?
(ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/zmailer/src/)
I didn't consider it an issue since I couldn't find any hits with the
rules in my corpora. Do you ever have it fire? Otherwise, it's a rule
that has an S/O of 0 hitting only on Hams.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20121210
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6875
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|User with Zmailer getting |User with
.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20121210-r1419267-n/TAB_IN_FROM/detail
hitting 18% of our spam corpus.
Wonder what the ham is in Darxus' corpus.
Wow, to go from 0 on my end checking a corpora of millions of messages
to yours with an 18% hit. Possible something on your end is
reformatting
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
Why isn't Zmailer dev requested to fix it?
Lowering our defenses for software which hardly anybody uses anymore and
which hasn't seen a release since 2007?
If the performance apart from zmailer is good in masscheck, then perhaps
an offsetting score for
On 12/10/2012 11:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
Why isn't Zmailer dev requested to fix it?
Lowering our defenses for software which hardly anybody uses anymore
and which hasn't seen a release since 2007?
If the performance apart from zmailer is good in masscheck,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
On 12/10/2012 11:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Axb wrote:
Why isn't Zmailer dev requested to fix it?
Lowering our defenses for software which hardly anybody uses anymore
and which hasn't seen a release since 2007?
If the performance
*** ASF Nagios ***
Notification Type: PROBLEM
Host: spamassassin2.zones.apache.org
Address: 192.87.106.247
State: UNREACHABLE
Info: CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 seconds
Date/Time: Tue Dec 11 05:10:13 UTC 2012
*** ASF Nagios ***
Notification Type: RECOVERY
Host: spamassassin2.zones.apache.org
Address: 192.87.106.247
State: UP
Info: PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 13.35 ms
Date/Time: Tue Dec 11 05:10:41 UTC 2012
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-12-08.
20121210: Spam: 466186, Ham: 177193
21 matches
Mail list logo
