How are the rule weights for spamassassin generated? There is a method
called boosting with several associated algorithms which is
specifically aimed at combining the outputs of a collection of weak
classifiers into a more accurate classifier. It seems somewhat
relevant, has it been tried?
might change in a
situation where misclassification costs are asymmetrical as with spam
classification.
Frederik
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:25:16PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Frederik Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How are the rule weights for spamassassin generated?
http
, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:10:12AM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
Frederik Eaton wrote:
Is it possible to configure spamassassin to get back the original
functionality of only modifying headers of spam
1. Look up the doc on rewrite_header and report_safe in man
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf or other
Yes, the version I have installed is 3.0.2.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 02:19:23PM +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
Frederik Eaton wrote:
As developers, you might want to add that information to the
part of the man page I quoted
I assume that you are referring to the released version
2. Any further questions about this or similar topics should be directed
to the SpamAssassin users mailing list, not to here. This list is for
developer discussions only. Don't even reply to this with an apology or
a thank you. I'll pretend that you have replied politely and leave it at
that
The spamassassin manual page says:
If an incoming message is tagged as spam, instead of modifying the
original message, SpamAssassin will create a new report message and
attach the original message as a message/rfc822 MIME part (ensuring the
original message is
Hi,
I've been using spamc/spamd as part of my mail filter, and I've run
into a few problems with the interface it provides.
1. I want to start a spamd process (as myself) if one is not already
running. At first I thought spamc should at least have an option to
automatically spawn a spamd if
