http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
Bug 3881 depends on bug 4260, which changed state.
Bug 4260 Summary: rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
What|Old Value |New Value
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
Bug 3881 depends on bug 4260, which changed state.
Bug 4260 Summary: rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
What|Old Value |New Value
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
Bug 3881 depends on bug 4260, which changed state.
Bug 4260 Summary: rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
What|Old Value |New Value
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
Bug 3881 depends on bug 4260, which changed state.
Bug 4260 Summary: rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
What|Old Value |New Value
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||4260
Bug 3881 depends on bug
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
Bug 3881 depends on bug 4260, which changed state.
Bug 4260 Summary: rewrite DNS code to use a single socket, event-based model
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260
What|Old Value |New Value
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-09 17:55 ---
any chance you could retry now that the DNS code no longer uses persistent
sockets?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-09 18:34 ---
Subject: Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code
Yeah, I've been testing.
It still happens in the same way with the performance patch, although it
seems
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.2.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-29 15:59 ---
Okay, I finished my performance testing. First raw results:
the test was:
for x in 1 2 3 4; do rndc flush; /usr/bin/time perl ./mass-check -f
/tmp/corpus
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2426 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-24 00:34 ---
Justin, you programming stud.
I had almost finished my IO::Select patch, but still failed to get acceptable
performance. Maybe I'll attach it for posterity.
February 2005 18:20:22 GMT-05:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 3881] dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code
I think these concerns can be entirely alleviated by not ever checking
bgisready() on each socket - just use the select() part of the code -
they both do the EXACT same
I tried to send this to bugzilla but it got ignored so sending it
straight to the list.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 25 February 2005 18:20:22 GMT-05:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bug 3881] dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code
I think
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev@spamassassin.apache.org
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 22:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=2443)
-- (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2443action=view)
patch which applies cleanly to trunk
modified patch
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3881
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 09:51 ---
looks nifty. Jan-Pieter, do you have a Contributor License Agreement on file
with the ASF, by any chance? unfortunately we'll need one to apply your patch,
I
19 matches
Mail list logo