On 9 Aug 2012, at 21:37, Kevin Golding wrote:
On 9 Aug 2012, at 16:26, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Can you add a few debug statements and see which scenario in
get_current_svn_revsion is being used?
Well I put print statements in every conditional in that sub and nothing came
out. So
Kevin Golding wrote:
Okay, that looks depressingly simple I guess... I added in extra statements
outside the conditionals and it proved I'm not successfully entering any of
them. It looks like my problem is line 998:
if (-d $dir/.svn || -f $dir/svninfo.tmp) {
At that point $dir =
On 10 Aug 2012, at 15:21, Kris Deugau wrote:
Kevin Golding wrote:
Okay, that looks depressingly simple I guess... I added in extra statements
outside the conditionals and it proved I'm not successfully entering any of
them. It looks like my problem is line 998:
if (-d $dir/.svn || -f
On 8/10/2012 10:23 AM, Kevin Golding wrote:
Aha, yes - I'd be using 1.7.5 I believe.
Thanks Kris, great catch. I've updated the bug to acknowledge the issue.
regards,
kAM
On 8/9/2012 7:25 AM, postmas...@caomhin.org wrote:
On 8/8/2012 5:23 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Kevin, I can see your submitting logs with SVN Revision: unknown That's
why you are missing, I think.
Okay, I think I've hurt my brain looking at this and I'll be honest, a bit
lost.
Are you using
On 9 Aug 2012, at 16:26, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/9/2012 7:25 AM, postmas...@caomhin.org wrote:
On 8/8/2012 5:23 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Kevin, I can see your submitting logs with SVN Revision: unknown That's
why you are missing, I think.
Okay, I think I've hurt my brain looking at
On 8/7/2012 10:14 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Anyone else seeing missing corpora?
Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included?
My uploaded corpora are not _missing_, but the number of messages
reported for them in the corpora
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/7/2012 10:14 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Anyone else seeing missing corpora?
Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included?
My uploaded corpora are not _missing_, but the number
On 8/8/2012 10:17 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/7/2012 10:14 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Anyone else seeing missing corpora?
Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included?
My uploaded
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/8/2012 10:17 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Can you point me out the masscheck page that you are seeing the
difference on?
On any masscheck report, it's listed in two places:
Thanks. Can you
On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote:
-1 but - it spit out even more high scores.
Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham?
+1 This would probably cause less havoc.
Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change
Jari, are you seeing your corpus?
Anyone else seeing missing
08.08.2012 23:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote:
-1 but - it spit out even more high scores.
Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham?
+1 This would probably cause less havoc.
Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change
Jari, are you seeing
08.08.2012 23:58, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
On 8/7/2012 11:58 AM, Axb wrote:
-1 but - it spit out even more high scores.
Or I tweak the days Ham is good for to include more ham?
+1 This would probably cause less havoc.
Upped from 72 to 84 with very little change
Jari, are you seeing
On 8/8/2012 5:38 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
# mass-check results from jarif@whirlwind, on ke 8.8.2012 13.55.30
+ # M:SA version 3.4.0-r1197259 # SVN revision: 1370707 # Date:
20120808T135530Z # Perl version: 5.014002 on
x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi This is from my last log, generated
09.08.2012 00:45, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
On 8/8/2012 5:38 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
# mass-check results from jarif@whirlwind, on ke 8.8.2012 13.55.30
+ # M:SA version 3.4.0-r1197259 # SVN revision: 1370707 # Date:
20120808T135530Z # Perl version: 5.014002 on
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
OK, so here's the issue:
The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass
check log contains:
# SVN revision: 1369288
N.B.: It's probably a very good idea to always do a SVN UP and make before
running a local masscheck for
On 08/08/2012 11:51 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
09.08.2012 00:45, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
On 8/8/2012 5:38 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
# mass-check results from jarif@whirlwind, on ke 8.8.2012 13.55.30
+ # M:SA version 3.4.0-r1197259 # SVN revision: 1370707 # Date:
20120808T135530Z #
On 8/8/2012 5:23 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
My corpus came online today. Strange, if you have not done something.
Or does it use my installed SA ? I had problems with that, but
re-built SA from cpan... Maybe that's the key... I was in the
impression that it downloads/rsyncs from development
09.08.2012 00:52, John Hardin kirjoitti:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
OK, so here's the issue:
The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass
check log contains:
# SVN revision: 1369288
N.B.: It's probably a very good idea to always do a SVN UP and
1364050 does not look good?
From what I can tell for the time period you were uploading, it was not
the right version, no.
Your newer uploads look better though and I think we are back on track.
Regards,
KAM
On 8/8/2012 6:24 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
09.08.2012 00:52, John Hardin kirjoitti:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
OK, so here's the issue:
The script running RIGHT now is checking to see if the uploaded mass
check log contains:
# SVN revision: 1369288
N.B.: It's probably a
I found the script which runs under updatesd via cron on zones 1
HAM: 135596 (15 required)
SPAM: 268096 (15 required)
Insufficient ham corpus to generate scores; aborting.
Exit Status 8 is not zero for do-nightly-resorce-example
Do we want to lower the limit for ham perhaps to 135?
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Anyone else seeing missing corpora?
Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included?
My uploaded corpora are not _missing_, but the number of messages reported
for them in the corpora report on the masscheck results pages are far
07.08.2012 16:37, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
Jari, are you seeing your corpus?
I don't quite understand your question. Yes I can see it locally,
jarif@whirlwind:~/masscheckwork/nightly_mass_check/masses$ wc -l
*-jarif.log
11827 ham-jarif.log
1611 spam-jarif.log
13438 yhteensä
But
On 08/07/2012 03:37 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: I found the script
which runs under updatesd via cron on zones 1
HAM: 135596 (15 required)
SPAM: 268096 (15 required)
Insufficient ham corpus to generate scores; aborting.
Exit Status 8 is not zero for do-nightly-resorce-example
On 08/07, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I found the script which runs under updatesd via cron on zones 1
Please document it on the wiki.
--
Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire,
a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should
it be left to
07.08.2012 18:58, Axb kirjoitti:
Jari, are you seeing your corpus?
Anyone else seeing missing corpora?
Is this possibly a problem where corpora are not being included?
I'm watching my masscheck logs closely - all there.
My typical log here (even increaset the rsync verbosity to be sure)
On 8/7/2012 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
My typical log here (even increaset the rsync verbosity to be sure)
I see your logs but one oddity I noticed is a lack of -net logs. Looks
like that might have stopped on Jul 21st?
-rw-r--r-- 1 rsyncrsync17038423 Aug 7 09:43
08.08.2012 00:30, Kevin A. McGrail kirjoitti:
On 8/7/2012 12:22 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
My typical log here (even increaset the rsync verbosity to be sure)
I see your logs but one oddity I noticed is a lack of -net logs. Looks
like that might have stopped on Jul 21st?
Yes, I have had
29 matches
Mail list logo
