https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Comment #21 from Henrik Krohns ---
(In reply to RW from comment #20)
> I don't have trunk, but looking at the patch I don't see any brackets being
> added around the sum. In which case
>
> 2*rules_matching(__FOO_*)
>
> would expand
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
RW changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwmailli...@googlemail.com
--- Comment #20
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Henrik Krohns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@hege.li
--- Comment #19 from
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Kevin A. McGrail changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |blocker
Target
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Comment #17 from Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com ---
CLA received from Karl. We can look at this as soon as 3.4.1 is done!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Mark Martinec mark.marti...@ijs.si changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3.2 |3.4.0
--
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group|security|
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Justin Mason j...@jmason.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Group|security|
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-28 06:19 ---
None of the choices look very happy, do they? :-(
Maybe could use a doubled asterisk for the glob(*): FOO_**_BAR. As long as
exponentiation doesn't use
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-28 14:48 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Maybe could use a doubled asterisk for the glob(*): FOO_**_BAR. As long as
exponentiation doesn't use this the syntax should be
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-27 03:08 ---
Okay. What do you suggest for syntax, since currently meta RULE FOO_*_BAR
would
be (FOO_) * (_BAR). Alternatives might be to use a character other than
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-27 12:39 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
how's about a faux function-style UI?
meta AA_MULTI_2 (rules_matching(AA_*) = 2)
What I like about this is that it allows for
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-27 13:19 ---
yeah -- re lexing, it'd be great to get a comment from Theo, who I think wrote
the current rev of that lexer... ping Theo ;)
--- You are receiving
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.0
--- Additional
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-26 20:04 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
btw, I think it may be better to stick with a glob, I'm afraid, since regexps
can be tricky to keep secure. any chance you could
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-26 03:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=3887)
-- (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3887action=view)
Patch to implement regular expressions in meta
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|meta SOMERULE (__SOMERULE_* |meta SOMERULE
19 matches
Mail list logo
