[Bug 8189] SORBS no longer works in SPAMASSASSIN

2024-03-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8189

Sidney Markowitz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INVALID
 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 CC||sid...@sidney.com

--- Comment #3 from Sidney Markowitz  ---
>From your comments, I see that you installed an old version of Spamassassin
(the current one is 4.0.0, with 4.0.1 to be released soon) and found that the
default configuration did not trigger SORBS rules when you think they should.
You were able to get it to trigger custom rules that you added to your
configuration. That proves that 1) The code in SpamAssassin does properly
handle using SORBS as an RBL; and 2) Your configuration after installing
SpamAssassin had a problem with SORBS, which you could work around by changing
the configuration.

You still have a problem, because even though your configuration seems to work,
it is doing so by running five different queries to SORBS nameservers instead
of just one query to the aggregate server and interpreting the results.

This is exactly the kind of problem that you can get help with on the users
mailing list. If after a discussion there you have an example of a specific
email message that demonstrates a bug in SpamAssassin, you can open a bug
report and attach the email along with the steps by which anyone can reproduce
the bug.

Until then, I am closing this issue again as "invalid". That doesn't mean that
your problem is invalid, only that it is not a valid issue for this forum and
is better taken to the user mailing list for help getting it resolved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 8189] SORBS no longer works in SPAMASSASSIN

2023-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8189

ADDISON74  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 CC||addisonmatt...@gmail.com
 Resolution|INVALID |---

--- Comment #2 from ADDISON74  ---
This was not a personal request. SORBS is not working in SpamAssassin based on
the default configuration as you claim. To prove you wrong, I will make the
next tests.

1. I used SpamAssassin based on the default installation with an email message
that should be identified in the SORBS lists. I did the testing in the CLI and
SA didn't find anything wrong.

2. I modified the SpamAssassin configuration file and added the following local
rules

header   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG Sender listed in SORBS Aggregated
tflags   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG net
scoreLR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_AGG 2.5

header   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL Sender listed in SORBS DUL
tflags   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL net
scoreLR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.5

header   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM Sender listed in SORBS Spam
tflags   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM net
scoreLR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM 1.5

header   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','new.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW Sender listed in SORBS New Spam
tflags   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW net
scoreLR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_NEW 1.5

header   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT
eval:check_rbl('sorbs-lastexternal','recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net.')
describe LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT Sender listed in SORBS Recent Spam
tflags   LR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT net
scoreLR_RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM_RCNT 1.5

I tested the message again in CLI and SA found the IP in AGG and NEW. Most
probably SA needs to update its DNSBL information regarding SORBS. The whole
SORBS section in SA needs to be revised based on this information
http://www.sorbs.net/general/using.shtml.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 8189] SORBS no longer works in SPAMASSASSIN

2023-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8189

Henrik Krohns  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INVALID
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||apa...@hege.li

--- Comment #1 from Henrik Krohns  ---
Please use mailing lists for personal support. There is no proof of a bug, and
SORBS works fine for others. Closing this.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/MailingLists

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.