Should be binary-compatible across 2.10.x, so yes.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you
> can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ma
Really - I didn't know this ever was changed. But in any case, I think you
can compile with 2.10.4 and run with 2.10.3 and it's fine - right?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> We don't actually use Scala from the user's OS anymore, we use it from the
> Spark build, so it's
We don’t actually use Scala from the user’s OS anymore, we use it from the
Spark build, so it’s not a big deal. This release just has some bug fixes.
Matei
On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Kay Ousterhout wrote:
> What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth the
> annoyance
What do we get by upgrading to 2.10.4? Just wondering if it's worth the
annoyance of everyone needing to download a new version of Scala, making
yet another version of the AMIs, etc.
-Kay
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Sounds good. Feel free to send a PR even though it
Sounds good. Feel free to send a PR even though it’s a small change (it leads
to better Git history and such).
Matei
On Mar 27, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Mark Hamstra wrote:
> FYI, Spark master does build cleanly and the tests do run successfully with
> Scala version set to 2.10.4, so we can probably
