oming from timestamps, the interval should have correct hours
(millisecond component), so comparing it with the "right kinds of
intervals" should always be correct.
Enrico
Am 11.02.20 um 17:06 schrieb Wenchen Fan:
What's your use case to compare intervals? It's tricky in Spark as
there is onl
ed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:01 AM Enrico Minack <mailto:m...@enrico.minack.dev>> wrote:
Hi Devs,
I would like to know what is the current roadmap of making
CalendarInterval comparable and orderable again (SPARK-29679,
SPARK-29385, #26337).
With #27262, this got reverted bu
11, 2020 at 8:01 AM Enrico Minack
wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I would like to know what is the current roadmap of making
> CalendarInterval comparable and orderable again (SPARK-29679,
> SPARK-29385, #26337).
>
> With #27262, this got reverted but SPARK-30551 does not mentio
of making
> CalendarInterval comparable and orderable again (SPARK-29679,
> SPARK-29385, #26337).
>
> With #27262, this got reverted but SPARK-30551 does not mention how to
> go forward in this matter. I have found SPARK-28494, but this seems to
> be stale.
>
> While I find it useful to comp
Hi Devs,
I would like to know what is the current roadmap of making
CalendarInterval comparable and orderable again (SPARK-29679,
SPARK-29385, #26337).
With #27262, this got reverted but SPARK-30551 does not mention how to
go forward in this matter. I have found SPARK-28494, but this seems