Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-04-03 Thread Tom Graves
I put up a pull request with documentation changes  https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/314   Tom On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 8:47 AM, Tom Graves tgraves...@yahoo.com wrote: Note I'm +1 with the doc changed to tell users to export SPARK_YARN_MODE=true before using spark-shell on yarn. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-04-02 Thread Tom Graves
Note I'm +1 with the doc changed to tell users to export SPARK_YARN_MODE=true before using spark-shell on yarn. I tested it on both hadoop 0.23 and 2.3 clusters using secure hdfs on linux. Tom On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 1:44 PM, Tom Graves tgraves...@yahoo.com wrote: No one else has reported

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-31 Thread Tom Graves
I should probably pull this off into another thread, but going forward can we try to not have the release votes end on a weekend? Since we only seem to give 3 days, it makes it really hard for anyone who is offline for the weekend to try it out.   Either that or extend the voting for more then

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-31 Thread Patrick Wendell
Yeah good point. Let's just extend this vote another few days? On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Tom Graves tgraves...@yahoo.com wrote: I should probably pull this off into another thread, but going forward can we try to not have the release votes end on a weekend? Since we only seem to give

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-31 Thread Tathagata Das
Yes, lets extend the vote for two more days from now. So the vote is open till *Wednesday, April 02, at 20:00 UTC* On that note, my +1 TD On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah good point. Let's just extend this vote another few days? On Mon, Mar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-31 Thread Kevin Markey
I had specifically requested that the ASM shading be included in the RC, hence my testing focused on that, but I ran other tests as well. Tested with a build of our project, running one of our applications from that build in yarn-standalone on a pseudocluster, and successfully redeploying and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-31 Thread Andrew Or
+1 tested on OSX On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Kevin Markey kevin.mar...@oracle.comwrote: I had specifically requested that the ASM shading be included in the RC, hence my testing focused on that, but I ran other tests as well. Tested with a build of our project, running one of our

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-30 Thread prabeesh k
+1 tested on Ubuntu12.04 64bit On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.comwrote: +1 tested on Mac OS X. Matei On Mar 27, 2014, at 1:32 AM, Tathagata Das tathagata.das1...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-30 Thread Patrick Wendell
TD - I downloaded and did some local testing. Looks good to me! +1 You should cast your own vote - at that point it's enough to pass. - Patrick On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:47 PM, prabeesh k prabsma...@gmail.com wrote: +1 tested on Ubuntu12.04 64bit On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Matei

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-29 Thread prabeesh k
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/docs/quick-start.md in line 127. one spelling mistake found please correct it. (proogram to program) On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Will Benton wi...@redhat.com wrote: RC3 works with the applications I'm working on now and MLLib performance is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-29 Thread Tathagata Das
Ah yes that should be and will be updated! One more update in docs. In the home page of spark streaming http://spark.incubator.apache.org/streaming/. Under Deployment Options It is mentioned that *Spark Streaming can read data from HDFS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.1 (RC3)

2014-03-28 Thread Will Benton
RC3 works with the applications I'm working on now and MLLib performance is indeed perceptibly improved over 0.9.0 (although I haven't done a real evaluation). Also, from the downstream perspective, I've been tracking the 0.9.1 RCs in Fedora and have no issues to report there either: