Github user arunmahadevan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/767#issuecomment-149425136
looks good to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964475#comment-14964475
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1073:
---
Github user arunmahadevan commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964303#comment-14964303
]
Jungtaek Lim commented on STORM-885:
[~knusbaum] I just would like to see its progress,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jungtaek Lim updated STORM-1093:
Fix Version/s: 0.11.0
> Launching Workers with resources specified in resource-aware schedulers
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964181#comment-14964181
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1110:
---
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pu
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/799#issuecomment-149365765
Since there're so many random test failures for now, we may be OK to treat
test is passed when more than one of two Travis build are success.
---
If your project is
Yeah, message-in-order is also critical for me since our team relies on
that.
Since we fixed this for now (by backporting), it will be fine for next RC.
2015-10-20 6:49 GMT+09:00 Derek Dagit :
> OK, well I hadn't seen this happen before downloading the release
> candidate.
>
> For 697059e958879c4
OK, well I hadn't seen this happen before downloading the release candidate.
For 697059e958879c4daae5f4db57ce9abc04e81bd7:
* Verified sigs & sums
* built the source and ran all tests
* deployed the tarball and ran word_count
-1: HeartSaVioR says STORM-996 does affect 0.9.x, then I agree it is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964122#comment-14964122
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1110:
---
GitHub user kishorvpatil reopened a pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964121#comment-14964121
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1110:
---
Github user kishorvpatil closed the pull re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964120#comment-14964120
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1110:
---
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the p
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/799#issuecomment-149356704
testing travis build..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user kishorvpatil closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user kishorvpatil reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/799
[STORM-1110] Fix Component Page for system components
- Remove redundant method `system-id?` - as is calls into static
`Utils/isSystemId`
- All System components are of type bolts.
You ca
Github user dossett commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/767#issuecomment-149346069
@arunmahadevan @harshach Do either of you have additional feedback on this
PR? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14964045#comment-14964045
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1073:
---
Github user dossett commented on the pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963982#comment-14963982
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1118:
---
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/805#issuecomment-149334480
+1 this is going to be very useful when attempting to profile storm
performance and underlying hardware performance
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963978#comment-14963978
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1119:
---
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/806#issuecomment-149334001
+1 nicely done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Zhuo Liu resolved STORM-1093.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Merged.
> Launching Workers with resources specified in resource-aware schedulers
> ---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/790
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963968#comment-14963968
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1093:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963964#comment-14963964
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1093:
---
Github user knusbaum commented on the pull
Github user knusbaum commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/790#issuecomment-149330539
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963820#comment-14963820
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-:
---
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull
Github user jerrypeng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/807#issuecomment-149309782
unrelated kafka messaging test failed in travis
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963797#comment-14963797
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-720:
--
Github user rtandonmsft commented on a diff in
Github user rtandonmsft commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/476#discussion_r42408922
--- Diff: bin/storm.cmd ---
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@
)
set path=%PATH%;%STORM_BIN_DIR%;%STORM_SBIN_DIR%
call start /b "%storm-command%" "%JAVA
Hi John ,
input.rabbitmq.port is being defined inside a yml file placed inside my
config folder which is in one of the dependent projects which my project
references .
Ironically , when I run this on LocalCluster everything works absolutely
fine . Only when I send it to the cluster is when the p
Where is input.rabbitmq.port defined? I would guess that it is a file that
is being read as a resource and that the resource is not available on the
worker but I can only guess, not know any specifics about the code in
question...
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:27 AM Ankur Garg wrote:
> Actual
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963579#comment-14963579
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-:
---
GitHub user jerrypeng opened a pull request
GitHub user jerrypeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/807
[STORM-] - Fix Validation for lots of different configs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jerrypeng/storm STORM-
Alterna
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963542#comment-14963542
]
vishnu rao commented on STORM-1022:
---
hi Robert,
the scenario i mentioned lead to the sa
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/790#issuecomment-149258631
The code looks good the tests all pass I am +1 on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963534#comment-14963534
]
Robert Joseph Evans commented on STORM-1022:
Yes exactly. I'm not really sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963510#comment-14963510
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1093:
---
Github user revans2 commented on the pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963506#comment-14963506
]
vishnu rao commented on STORM-1022:
---
hi Robert,
The Stack trace provided is of the Metr
Actually its not only yml , infact none of the dependencies are getting
injected . Perhaps , it appears to me that it is not able to read Spring
Annotations .
Btw , do u know how to debug my application deployed on remote cluster
remotely from Eclipse.
Thanks
Ankur
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:22 P
you may have to tell Spring that ur .yaml file is ur resource file.
Ravi.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ankur Garg wrote:
> Hi Ravi ,
>
> Need your help . So I created a local cluster and deployed my topology to
> it . Inside my Spout and Bolts , I am launching a Spring Boot application
> wr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963410#comment-14963410
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1093:
---
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in
Github user revans2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/790#discussion_r42380191
--- Diff: conf/defaults.yaml ---
@@ -140,7 +140,8 @@ supervisor.memory.capacity.mb: 3072.0
supervisor.cpu.capacity: 400.0
### worker.* configs a
Hi Ravi ,
Need your help . So I created a local cluster and deployed my topology to
it . Inside my Spout and Bolts , I am launching a Spring Boot application
wrapped inside a singleton to initialise my context . Unfortunately , it
appears to me that it is not working : and annotations like
@E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963364#comment-14963364
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1118:
---
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the p
Github user kishorvpatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/805#issuecomment-149225741
LGTM. +1. `storm-metrics` would be useful sub-module to keep up our efforts
with improving storm metrics.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Renkai,
The execution models between storm and akka are rather different. Storm has
dedicated threads for each executor, although multiple tasks (bolt/spout
instances) can share the same executor thread. We rely on the OS to do the
right thing in scheduling threads to run. Akka is using an ac
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/806#issuecomment-149219565
+1 this is much better then we currently have
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963334#comment-14963334
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1119:
---
Github user revans2 commented on the pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963328#comment-14963328
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1117:
---
Github user revans2 commented on the pull r
Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/804#issuecomment-149218963
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963324#comment-14963324
]
Robert Joseph Evans commented on STORM-1022:
[~jaihind213],
The error you are
Github user JamisonWhite commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/335#issuecomment-149218263
Closing pull request because other contributors have updated the python
files for Windows.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user JamisonWhite closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/335
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mjtieman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/454#issuecomment-149210877
@HeartSaVioR Mind taking a look at these changes to determine if they
should be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Hi All,
The data platform team at Inmobi recently performed an extensive evaluation
exercise in the process of finalizing the real-time Stream processing stack
as the choice of our platform.
We have captured all the details of our evaluation as the following series
of 4 blogs which have been publ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14963167#comment-14963167
]
vishnu rao commented on STORM-1022:
---
I came across the same exception while using STORM
56 matches
Mail list logo
