Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Erik Weathers

Congrats Erik. -Harsha On Fri, Feb 23, 2018, at 11:15 AM, Karthick Duraisamy Soundararaj wrote: > Whoa! Congratulations, Erik. Well deserved! > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Erik Weathers < > eweath...@groupon.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Thanks everyone! And

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

+1 to replace storm-kafka-client in 1.0.x branch -Harsha On Tue, Jan 30, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Bump up this thread so that we could reach consensus earlier. Given that we > got concern related to this, I think it is ideal to release 1.1.x/1.0.x > with making decision and

Re: [DISCUSS] Decouple Storm core and connectors

they are addressed or any action item is taken. We should start another thread to discuss this process as well. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, Jan 30, 2018, at 9:49 AM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro wrote: > I think that the bahir approach makes sense for connectors that don’t > fall into the "

Re: [Discussion]: Storm Improvemement Proposal (SIP) to discuss changes

. -Harsha On Fri, Jun 9, 2017, at 09:16 PM, Harsha wrote: > Arun, >For big features we did follow design doc/review. Making it >formal makes everyone to follow a process. > Again this process is not for bug fixes as we stated its about New > Features/Config

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.1 (rc2)

+1. Deployed on a 3 node cluster and ran sample topologies. -Harsha On Sat, Jul 29, 2017, at 08:11 AM, Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: > Unpacked the binary tar and built ExclamationTopology against Nexus > staging. > Started Nimbus, a supervisor and the UI daemon via storm.cmd. &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.1 (rc1)

Tested source code by running unit tests and installed binaries to run example topologies. +1. -Harsha On Tue, Jul 25, 2017, at 10:08 AM, Bobby Evans wrote: > I built from source (v1.1.1 88f0b8a45553ea960164fab18c736a5cdbae8e58) ran > all of the unit tests and ran some manual tests. >

Re: [DISCUSS] [Storm-Kafka] - Maintenance, Branch Support, and Deprecation Plans for storm-kafka and storm-kaka-client

connector doesnt’ make sense and honestly splits the usage which doesn’t give us any feedback on new storm-kafka-client. Thanks, Harsha On Wed, Jul 19, 2017, at 09:20 AM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro wrote: > Hi, > > The goal of this email is to summarize and unify the discussion started > across s

Re: [DISCUSS] Storm 2.0 Roadmap

+1 for above stated approach on releasing 1.2.0 with metrics -Harsha On Tue, Jun 27, 2017, at 12:17 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > The work on metrics is ready for a pull request to 1.x-branch from the > feature branch. I’ve held off because we haven’t reached consensus on a > pat

[Discussion]: Storm Improvemement Proposal (SIP) to discuss changes

er too far in the wrong direction to bring up and improve or remove this process. We should also as a community strive to have better quality and I am hoping this will give us a chance to not only let users know what are changes coming in but also keep the dev list to have a chance and join the discussion

Re: Use of the KafkaConsumer.subscribe API in the storm-kafka-client spout

way to go. -Harsha On Jun 9, 2017, 4:09 PM -0700, Hugo Da Cruz Louro <hlo...@hortonworks.com>, wrote: +1 for simplifying KafkaSpoutConfig. Too many constructors and too many methods.. I am not sure it’s justifiable to have any methods that simply set KafkaConsumer properties. All of these proper

Re: Use of the KafkaConsumer.subscribe API in the storm-kafka-client spout

d for the users. The contract here is put whatever the producer configs that users wants in the conf object and we create producer out of that config. Honestly these interfaces needs to be simple and let the user have control instead of adding our interpretation. Thanks, Harsha On Ju

Re: [Discussion]: Storm Improvemement Proposal (SIP) to discuss changes

feedback and potentially caught any issues before the implementation. Thanks, Harsha On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:24 PM Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: Can you please explain how KIP currently works and how you would like to see something similar in storm? If w

[Discussion]: Storm Improvemement Proposal (SIP) to discuss changes

to wiki to see the list of changes went into a release. Community overall will be well informed of the changes as well. Would like to hear your thoughts. Thanks, Harsha

Re: Use of the KafkaConsumer.subscribe API in the storm-kafka-client spout

the kafka consumer config or properties file and forwarding it to KafkaConsumer. We made it overly complex and unnecessary. Thanks, Harsha

Re: Recording - Storm & Kafka Meetup on April 20th 2017

Hi Aditya, Thanks for your interest. We entatively planning one in June 1st week. If you haven't already please register here https://www.meetup.com/Apache-Storm-Apache-Kafka/ . I'll keep the Storm lists updated once we finalize the date & location. Thanks, Harsha On Mon, Ap

Storm Meetup in BayArea on April 20th

Hi All, We are organizing a Storm Meetup at Hortonworks HQ in Santa Clara,CA. If you are interested in attending please RSVP here https://www.meetup.com/Apache-Storm-Apache-Kafka/events/238975416/ Thanks, Harsha

Re: [DISCUSS] Move non-connectors modules to out of external

We should this in next release of 1.x or 2.0. I am +1 on continue with current release. -Harsha On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:53 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > The question remains if we want to do this in the 1.1.0 release, or later. > > If it's the 1.1.0 release

Re: [DISCUSS] Move non-connectors modules to out of external

and storm-perf into top-level. We can have discussion for storm 2.0 if we want to do more changes. -Harsha On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:31 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we decide to change the structure of the distribution like this, I > think we should do it in masrw

Re: [DISCUSS] Move non-connectors modules to out of external

+1 on moving non-connectors to top-level like sql and storm-perf. Regarding storm-kafka-monitor we can move this into "util" folder or keep in the external. -Harsha On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:23 AM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com> wrote: > storm-kafka-monitor is not a

Re: [DISCUSS] Storm 2.0 Roadmap

Storm 2.0 migration to java in itself is a big win and would attract wider community and adoption. So my vote would be to resolve the first 3 items to get a release out. All the other featured mentioned are great to have but shouldn't be blockers for 2.0 release. -Harsha On Thu, Mar 23, 2017

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.0 (RC3)

I propose that we continue with the release and get this patch in next minor release (probably 1.1.1?). Users doesn't need to upgrade their cluster to get this change so I would say this is not a show-stopper for the release. -Harsha On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:18 AM P. Taylor Goetz <p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.0 (RC3)

+1 for documenting and releasing. -Harsha On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:04 AM Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to the latter. > > I'm in favor of documenting the change to release note, and also docs so > that website can be reflected. The users who are affected to the

Apache Storm Meetup in BayArea

Hi All, We are planning on scheduling a Storm Meetup in April 1st week. Here is the meetup link https://www.meetup.com/Apache-Storm-Apache-Kafka/. If you are interested in talking about your use-cases in storm there is 1 more slot available, please reach out to me. Thanks, Harsha

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 1.1.0

-client and 1.1.0 release brings in lot of improvements and bug-fixes. -Harsha On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:15 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > There seems some pull requests for bugfix/improvement on > storm-kafka-client, and some authors in PRs are not availble for now. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.3 (rc1)

+1 Tested in 3 node vagant cluster and ran few example topologies. Looks good and verified the signature of artifacts. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:13 AM Bobby Evans wrote: > +1 Ran some simple tests in cluster mode. > > > - Bobby > > On Wednesday, February 1, 2017,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 1.1.0

Trying to check the status on this release of 1.1.0. Are we going to do this release anytime soon? On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:50 PM S G wrote: > Not sure if its a little late to include for the 1.1.0 and 1.0.3 releases > now, but can we consider using zookeeper 3.4.9

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopt pull request template

discretion as they would understand what commits are more important. Also as reviewers one can suggest to squash the commits if additional commits doesn't make sense. Thanks, Harsha On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:29 AM Hugo Da Cruz Louro <hlo...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I am strongly +1. In additi

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disable integration test

Having integration tests run as part of the travis helps finding any run-time issues that we might not be able to catch otherwise. Can you please file a JIRA, Raghav who put this together might help. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 6:15 AM Xin Wang <data.xinw...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] breaking changes in 2.x

path there will less uses on the new version. Critical API changes can still be possible by versioning the API. -Harsha On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:06 AM Kyle Nusbaum <knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 9, 2016, 7:23:09 AM CST, Harsha Chintalapani < >

Re: [DISCUSS] breaking changes in 2.x

? -Harsha On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:16 AM Kyle Nusbaum <knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: I worry that making it a priority to have rolling upgrades between major versions significantly restricts the kinds of changes that we can make, including some kinds of changes that a major version inc

Re: Fw: Re: [DISCUSS] breaking changes in 2.x

me if I am wrong here. Thanks, Harsha On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:43 AM Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: > Made a mistake and put something on private that never should have been > there. Here is the discussion in full so far. > In response to Jungtake removing the

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept JW Player SQE Code Donation

ion for someone to contribute. -Harsha On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I didn’t mean to imply that the code donation would come with automatic > committership. I would expect the SQE developers to engage with the Storm > community and

Re: Rolling upgrades for a topology using kafka spout

Abhishek, Are you looking rolling upgrade kafka cluster or storm? Harsha On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:18 AM Abhishek Agarwal <abhishc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2016 2:50 PM, "Abhishek Agarwal" <abhishc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.2 (RC1)

We need to get this patch in for 0.10 release https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1645 Thanks, Harsha On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:28 AM Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 - Bobby > > On Friday, August 26, 2016 9:03 AM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com&g

Re: [Vote] Make Java 8 as minimum requirement for Storm 2.0

16, 2016, at 9:18 PM, Harsha Chintalapani <st...@harsha.io> > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > >We had a discussion thread for removing Java 7 support for Storm > > 2.0. > > Here is a formal voting thread and the JIRA > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2041. > > > > Thanks, > > Harsha > >

[Vote] Make Java 8 as minimum requirement for Storm 2.0

Hi All, We had a discussion thread for removing Java 7 support for Storm 2.0. Here is a formal voting thread and the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2041. Thanks, Harsha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.7 (RC1)

Do we have any user requests on releasing 0.9.x . I rather propose them to move on to 0.10.x line and retire 0.9.x branches. There are quite few issues that got fixed in 0.10.x release line and keep maintaining 0.9.x line wouldn't be beneficial. Thanks, Harsha On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:48 PM

Re: Website update

://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q2uzRIkTd8=youtu.be http://www.slideshare.net/HadoopSummit/managing-hadoop-hbase-and-storm-clusters-at-yahoo-scale https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib8ch-xVzbw -Harsha On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, at 08:42 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Hi dev, > > Along with taking car

[Discussion] Dropping Java 7 support on master

Hi All, Dropping java 7 support on master will allow us to use the new api in Java 8 and since the master is being used for java migration its good to make the decision now. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Harsha

[Discussion] Dropping Java 7 support on master

Hi All, Dropping java 7 support on master will allow us to use the new api in Java 8 and since the master is being used for java migration its good to make the decision now. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Harsha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.2 (rc4)

+1 (binding) Ran a single node cluster and tried example topologies. Verified signatures on the artifcats. -Harsha On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:02 AM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran on a 3-node cluster and verified fixes. > > -Taylor > >

Re: New Committers/PMC Members: John Fang and Abhishek Agarwal

Congrats John & Abhishek ! -Harsha On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, at 02:14 PM, Aaron.Dossett wrote: > I second that! > > On 6/7/16, 3:12 PM, "Bobby Evans" <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >Congratulations to both of you. Well deserved. > > - Bobby &g

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squashing commits before merging in.

commented out the line that pushes to apache git repo until I get some feedback but you can safely run it and see how the final commit looks like. Thanks, Harsha On Sun, May 15, 2016, at 07:04 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Moving opinions from other threads, > > Abhishek > >

Re: STORM JIRA being spammed - CANNOT comment on JIRA (as a result of the counter spam measures)

as well. At least for us this is helpful to look at what went though the patch when a user hits a similar issue. Thanks, Harsha On Mon, May 16, 2016, at 01:22 PM, Erik Weathers wrote: > :_( I was happy for a second that the comments weren't getting added to > JIRA. I still have no

Re: Revisiting forgotten discussions regarding more convenience way to maintain project

Jungtaek, If we didn't get any conclusion. Lets continue discussion on the same thread. You can just reply to that. Lets not merge all discussions into major thread where we can't even track which subject we are discussing. Thanks, Harsha On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 08:56 PM

Re: Revisiting forgotten discussions regarding more convenience way to maintain project

. notifications important for everyone else. if you are getting spammed by this create a mail rule. -Harsha On Fri, May 13, 2016, at 07:47 AM, Aaron.Dossett wrote: > I like the idea of squashing to a single commit and tagging that commit > and PR with the JIRA ID. Agree that limiting duplicate emails

Re: STORM JIRA being spammed - CANNOT comment on JIRA (as a result of the counter spam measures)

Bobby, Can you check if I am part of commiters list. I don't see admin page for STORM project jira. Thanks, Harsha On Thu, May 12, 2016, at 02:23 PM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro wrote: > Thanks Bobby. It’s working now. > > > On May 12, 2016, at 1:48 PM, Bobby Evans

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.1 (rc2)

Roshan, This is 0.10 maint release . We are not going to include the new features that went into 1.0. +1 (binding) Deployed on a 3-node cluster Ran example topologies verified signatures of binaries. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, May 3, 2016, at 05:16 PM, Roshan Naik wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.1 (rc3)

+1 (binding) - Deployed 3-node cluster and example topologies - Verified the binaries signature. Thanks, Harsha On Sun, May 1, 2016, at 07:11 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - build succeed from source code > - binary extracted well, and supervisor launches work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.1 (rc2)

storm-env.sh introduced if users want override any environment variables. we can either comment out the line as default or what Taylor proposed looks good too. -Harsha On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 08:27 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > HDP uses storm-env.sh, which is where it came from. That makes se

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.1 (rc1)

Same as 1.0.1 release. I would like to get those two patches in for 0.10.1 release as well. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, at 05:27 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Same on 1.0.1 RC1, but only STORM-1731 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1731> is affected to 0.10.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.1

I am +1 on doing another release candidate with these fixes in. Nice work Jungtaek. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, at 05:23 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > I've observed the points of performance hit (STORM-1729 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1729>, STORM-1

Re: Publishing cluster stats on Apache Storm

we would have all cluster details including topologies as well. Thanks, Harsha On Mon, Apr 18, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Cody, > > Great idea! Let's try it out. > I'll send the mail to user@ regarding use cases or concerns of metrics on > Apach

Re: [Discussion] rolling upgrade of storm topologies with 1.0 release

the storm.zookeeper.root node and not touch any other nodes in the zookeeper. -Harsha On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro wrote: > Agree with Jungtaek. > > With the new KafkaSpout we should not have to worry about preserving > offsets, as it’s done by Kafk

Re: [Discussion] rolling upgrade of storm topologies with 1.0 release

Erik, Thanks. Missed that. I think we should default to that especially to support the rolling upgrade part. Thanks, Harsha On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Erik Weathers wrote: > hey Harsha, > > Did you see Abhishek's emailt to the list yesterday? > > In the

[Discussion] rolling upgrade of storm topologies with 1.0 release

. Why not we package backtype.storm and add @deprecated to this package and keep it in lib folder for couple of releases and have a plan around removing it in future versions. Thanks, Harsha

Re: 答复: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.0 (rc2)

+1 (binding) Tested in a 3 node cluster with example topologies. Checked the binaries. Thanks, Harsha On Thu, Apr 7, 2016, at 10:02 PM, John Fang wrote: > +1 > > Regards >John Fang > > > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Bobby Evans [mailto:ev...@yahoo-inc.com.IN

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.0 (rc1)

Taylor, Lets do another release build since we have other jiras merged in . Thanks, Harsha On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, at 02:07 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > FYI I’ve merged fixes for following to the 1.x-branch: > * STORM-1670: LocalState#get(String) can throw FileNotFoundExc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.0 (rc1)

For rc2 please include STORM-1670 as well. Source distribution is important as well. -Harsha On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 01:02 AM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > Here's my test, > > - testing with source distribution : FAIL > - unzip : OK > - building from source dist : FAIL >

Re: 答复: Question on Metrics Server to Alibaba team

on is that we should not reinvent the wheel (aka > > > > distributed fault tolerant metrics) ourselves.  The local file > > > > blobstore with nimbus HA was a big enough pain to write and it is > > > > relatively simple in comparison. > > > > If the JStorm c

Re: Question on Metrics Server to Alibaba team

. --Harsha On Mon, Mar 21, 2016, at 08:49 AM, Abhishek Agarwal wrote: > @Cody - The design looks good. Does the design allow to aggregate metrics > at the task/executor level? Basically, number of distinct metrics is > proportional to the number of distinct tasks, did you

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Storm MySql Spout

Hi Sourav, I just took a look. This looks great. It would be great if you can contribute to this connector Apache Storm. If so can you please open a JIRA and open a PR https://github.com/apache/storm. Thanks, Harsha On Sun, Mar 20, 2016, at 08

Re: Issues in Storm deployment

version of storm but relevant for the latest as well. -Harsha On Sun, Mar 13, 2016, at 01:43 PM, vibha goyal wrote: > Hi, > > I am grad student, and I am working on Storm as a part of my course > project. > > I have cloned the source code from git, and followed the instruction

Re: [DISCUSS] Java REST Framework adoption

offlate. Underneath it uses jersey and one can run jetty server as well which is what we've as the UI and logviewer server. -Harsha On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 08:23 AM, Ravi Sharma wrote: > spring boot + > > Ravi > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Ankur Garg <ankurga..

Re: zookeeper setup for storm cluster

ed more than single machine or not ? > > how it can be in distributed mode in single machine ? > > > Thanks for your help > > > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Harsha <st...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > In storm, local mode means you run by using LocalCluster

Re: zookeeper setup for storm cluster

host.name -Harsha On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 11:12 AM, researcher cs wrote: > thanks i checked the link it's good for me but the question that i'm > searching about > 1- is production mode means distributed mode ? > 2- if question 1 = yes , is that mean working on more than one machine ? &g

Re: zookeeper setup for storm cluster

not quite sure about what you mean by importing a topology that run in two modes in local or production. In the first link I gave you , wordcount topology can run local cluster and on distributed as well. -Harsha On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, at 08:54 AM, researcher cs wrote: > can i find help ? > > On

Re: Problem with storm since 4 months

Sam, you might be using very old version of storm since its showing ZeroMQ. Can you try using newer version storm without zero mq. -Harsha On Wed, Dec 9, 2015, at 10:19 AM, sam mohel wrote: > I have this problem since 4months when I submitted topology I

Re: Welcome new Apache Storm Committers/PMC Members

Congrats everyone. -Harsha On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, at 03:19 PM, Priyank Shah wrote: > Congratulation everyone! > > > > > On 12/8/15, 3:17 PM, "Hugo Da Cruz Louro" <hlo...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > >Congrats everyone. Looking forward to working wi

Re: supervisor的讨论

Hi John,         Thanks for the doc about supervisor. Could you please add this to wiki here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STORM/Storm+Home  and start a discussion thread around it. Thanks, Harsha On Fri, Nov 27, 2015, at 04:15 AM, John Fang wrote: > > Email had 1 atta

Re: [DISCUSS] Storm 2.0 plan

. Thanks, Harsha On Fri, Nov 20, 2015, at 01:03 AM, Longda Feng wrote: > > @Sean, Thanks for clarify. > @Taylor, @Bobby, @Sean, @Jungtaek, @Harsha, @dev, > Sorry for leading to misunderstanding. > The biggest point:We would like to merge two community into one > community, One com

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan for Merging JStorm Code

Taylor, Can you add me to the wiki as well my id is "harsha". Thanks, Harsha On Fri, Nov 20, 2015, at 01:19 AM, Longda Feng wrote: > @Taylor, I want to work with Bobby, my wiki name is "longda". > ThanksLongda--

Re: [DISCUSS] Storm 2.0 plan

from JStorm we should do that . Thanks, Harsha On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 10:13 PM, Longda Feng wrote: > Sorry for changing the Subject. > > I am +1 for releasing Storm 2.0 with java core, which is merged with > JStorm. > > I think the change of this release will be the bigge

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Release (was Re: [DISCUSS] Initial 0.11.0 Release)

+1 on Bobby's suggestion on moving the packages to storm-compat and have it part of lib folder. Moving 1.0 with org.apache.storm will make it easier in the future rather than wait for 2.0 release we should make this change now and in 2.0 we can remove the storm-compat jar. Thanks, Harsha

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan for Merging JStorm Code

n among storm community along with jstorm. We need to come up with plan of action on what code needs to be merged into storm-core. I am thinking it will help better to have everyone over video chat or something to go over the code and get it migrated to java. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, Nov 10, 2015,

Re: Builds on Windows

Bit more details on windows. We do have builds going internally on windows , but not the latest trunk which we will be doing soon. Regarding auth-test yes thats an issue and storm security in general not going to work in windows. We disable this test for windows. I think we should put a check in

Re: [Discusson] Storm System Tests

enarios for testing, with/without > > security. Talking to Kafka, Hadoop(HBase, HDFS, Hive), redis, > > elastasearch, etc. > > These would be run frequently but not necessarily a part of CI initially. > > - Bobby > > > > > >On Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Re: [Discusson] Storm System Tests

Thanks Longda. Can you update this JIRA with list of tests cases that you are running in this JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1179 -Harsha On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 08:32 PM, 封仲淹(纪君祥LongdaFeng) wrote: > +1 > By the way, Tong(王桐) can work for this. Tong is respo

Re: Welcome JStorm Community!

Welcome JStorm community. Thanks for your contributions to JStorm and looking forward to working with you to make Storm better. Thanks, Harsha On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 02:05 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > For those who may not be aware, Alibaba has donated JStorm to Apache > Storm, and w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.6 (rc2)

+1 1. Ran the unit tests 2. Verified artifacts 3. Ran a cluster deployed example topologies. -Harsha On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 09:45 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Yes, I’ve seen that. It has something to do with clojure tests and the > maven lifecycle. > > I typically just do `mvn c

Re: [VOTE] Accept Alibaba JStorm Code Donation

+1 (binding) -Harsha On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 12:10 PM, Priyank Shah wrote: > +1 > > From: "P. Taylor Goetz" > Reply-To: <dev@storm.apache.org<mailto:dev@storm.apache.org>> > Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 at 11:05 AM > To: <dev@storm.apache.org&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

+1 1. Ran unit tests 2. Deployed example topologies 3. Verified artifacts -Harsha On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, at 07:23 AM, Bobby Evans wrote: > +1 looks good, built from the git tag and ran some simple test. >  - Bobby > > > On Friday, October 23, 2015 9:47 PM, 임정택 <kabh..

Re: worker-launcher - there is now native code included in Storm?

://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/SECURITY.md -Harsha On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 03:10 PM, Erik Weathers wrote: > It seems that in storm 0.10 we have native code (C) that is being used > for > launching workers. I haven't found any reference to how this might > affect > deploymen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

Taylor, STORM-1039 & STORM-1042 are blockers without these UI won't work. We need to include these in the release as well. Thanks, Harsha On Fri, Sep 11, 2015, at 10:41 PM, 임정택 wrote: > +1 > > - test passed : OK > -- extract source tar > -- build via

Re: Nexusguard is using storm

Hi Juniman, Thanks for the mail. Can you send us your logo I'll get it included in the new storm website. Thanks, Harsha On Wed, Sep 9, 2015, at 09:47 PM, Juniman Kasman wrote: > Hi storm team, > We are using Storm and would like to be added below

Re: Submitting multiple jars to a topology classpath

with all of its dependencies included in the jar. Thanks, Harsha On July 29, 2015 at 11:57:19 PM, Abhishek Agarwal (abhishc...@gmail.com) wrote: Currently, as far as I know one has to package all the dependencies into one jar and then submit it along with topology class. StormSubmitter interface

Re: Storm Project

:). As others noted we are very much active and motivated community to make storm even better. Thanks, Harsha On Sat, Jul 18, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Parth Brahmbhatt wrote: Have you seen this http://yahoohadoop.tumblr.com/post/122544585051/apache-storm-roadmap-at-yah oo ? Or if you still have

Bay area meetup group for Apache Storm Kafka

If you are interested in attending bay area meetup for Apache Storm Kafka . Please join the group here http://www.meetup.com/Apache-Storm-Apache-Kafka/ Thanks, Harsha

Re: Newbie questions about deploying to cluster

Tim, If its production cluster I highly recommend having zk cluster with at least 3 nodes. So that your cluster survives in case of zk nodes going down. Thanks, Harsha On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 06:07 AM, Paul Poulosky wrote: The machine that you submit your topology

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc2)

+1 for the release. 1) verified keys on all release artifacts. 2) verified deploying topologies in secure and non-secure cluster. --  Harsha On June 8, 2015 at 12:06:31 PM, Parth Brahmbhatt (pbrahmbh...@hortonworks.com) wrote: +1. Agree about not blocking the release. ‹ unit tests passed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.9.5

+1 (binding) Verified installing a cluster and running example topologies. Verified release artifacts keys asc, sha and md5. Thanks, Harsha On May 29, 2015 at 4:43:38 PM, 임정택 (kabh...@gmail.com) wrote: - test passed : OK - extract source tar : OK - build via mvn clean install” : OK

[DISCUSSION] Squashing commits before merging in.

down all the commits that went in for a particular JIRA. I am proposing we should squash these multiple commits into one singe commit before merging into trunk and associate the STORM JIRA in commit message. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Harsha

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0

Hi,         For storm 0.10.0 please add if you want any JIRAs that should be included. I want to include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617 Thanks, Harsha On March 12, 2015 at 9:30:25 AM, T B (thomas...@arcor.de) wrote: Hi,         For storm 0.10.0 please add if you want any JIRAs

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0

Taylor,          STORM-617 is on me I’ll send a patch in next couple of days. Thanks, Harsha On March 19, 2015 at 1:05:21 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgo...@gmail.com) wrote: With the VOTE underway for a 0.9.4 release ( if you have time, please evaluate the RC and vote accordingly), I’d like

Re: Contributing to Storm

Hi Oleg,        Here is a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-710 to start on. Thanks, Harsha On March 18, 2015 at 9:34:36 AM, Oleg Ostashchuk (ostas...@fel.cvut.cz) wrote: Hello, I would like to contribute to Apache Storm project. Can you please advise me some issue or work

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Storm 0.9.4 / 0.10.0

Sorry for the late reply. I am +1 on releasing 0.9.4 . For 0.10.0 I would like to include this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-617 Thanks, Harsha On March 11, 2015 at 1:52:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgo...@gmail.com) wrote: Sorry for the late reply. I am +1 on releasing 0.9.4

Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Thomas Becker

Congrats Thomas and Welcome :) --  Harsha On March 10, 2015 at 11:09:05 AM, P. Taylor Goetz (ptgo...@apache.org) wrote: Please join me in welcoming Thomas Becker (wurstmeister) as a new Apache Storm Committer/PMC member. Thomas has made significant contributions to the Storm codebase

Re: [VOTE] Adopt Apache Storm Project Bylaws

+1 -Harsha On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 07:48 AM, Melan Nimesh wrote: +1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Nathan Marz nat...@nathanmarz.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Andy Feng andy.f...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Andy Feng Sent from my iPhone On Feb 18

Re: HdfsBolt and hdfs in HA mode

) .withFileNameFormat(fileNameformat) .withRecordFormat(format) .withRotationPolicy(rotationPolicy) .withSynPolicy(syncPolicy); The above is all that needed to use namenode HA with your storm-hdfs. -Harsha On Thu, Feb 19, 2015, at 08:58 AM, Bobby Evans wrote

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopt Apache Storm Bylaws

-inc.com.invalid wrote: I am fine with this. I mostly want a starting point, and we can adjust things from there is need be. - Bobby     On Sunday, February 8, 2015 8:39 PM, Harsha st...@harsha.io wrote: Thanks for putting this together. Proposed bylaws looks good

  1   2   >