Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

t; >>>> >> >>>> +1 for that too. We should be on the same page here, but this is >> >> non-binding. The bylaws state that any PMC member can bring up a >> release >> >> for a vote. >> >>>> - Bobby >> >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

; > >>>> +1 for that too. We should be on the same page here, but this is > >> non-binding. The bylaws state that any PMC member can bring up a > release > >> for a vote. > >>>> - Bobby > >>>> > >>>> On Monday, May 9, 20

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

; wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> +1. Same here. >>>> >>>>> On 5/9/16, 5:47 AM, "John Fang" <xiaojian@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch >>>>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

xiaojian@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch > >>> > >>> -邮件原件- > >>> 发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] > >>> 发送时间: 2016年5月9日 19:42 > >>> 收件人: dev@

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

+1. Same here. >> >> On 5/9/16, 5:47 AM, "John Fang" <xiaojian@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch >>> >>> -邮件原件- >>> 发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] &g

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

gt; > +1. Same here. > > On 5/9/16, 5:47 AM, "John Fang" <xiaojian@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: > >> I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch >> >> -邮件原件- >> 发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] >> 发送时间: 2016年

Re: 答复: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

"John Fang" <xiaojian@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: >I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch > >-邮件原件- >发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] >发送时间: 2016年5月9日 19:42 >收件人: dev@storm.apache.org >主题: Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.

Re: 答复: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

+1. Same here. On 5/9/16, 5:47 AM, "John Fang" <xiaojian@alibaba-inc.com> wrote: >I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch > >-邮件原件- >发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] >发送时间: 2016年5月9日 19:42 >收件人: dev@storm.apache.org >主题

答复: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

I'm also think we shouldn't maintain 0.10.x branch -邮件原件- 发件人: Cody Innowhere [mailto:e.neve...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2016年5月9日 19:42 收件人: dev@storm.apache.org 主题: Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x I'm also +1 for maintaining 1.x branch & master and not maintaining 0.10.x br

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

I'm also +1 for maintaining 1.x branch & master and not maintaining 0.10.x branch. On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Abhishek Agarwal wrote: > +1. There is lot development effort pending against 1.x branch which will > get unblocked with 1.1.0 branch. I am assuming, we will

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

+1. There is lot development effort pending against 1.x branch which will get unblocked with 1.1.0 branch. I am assuming, we will not introduce any backward incompatible changes in the new branch. But what will be the release timeline of 1.1.0? Many of the PRs affect small portion of code. Back

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

What a coincidence! :) My feeling is that this issue would be another representation of 'drop further releases of 0.x'. If we want to have minor and bugfix version separated, we would have at least 3 branches, master (for 2.0), 1.1.x, 1.0.x. I'm seeing that not all bugfixes are applied to 0.10.x

Re: [DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

Perfect timing as I was thinking about similar things. The new metrics APIs being proposed against the 1.x branch would be an API addition, and IMO should bump the minor version when added. I'd be +1 for that. I guess it comes down to how many version branches do we want to support? We may

[DISCUSSION] Version lines of 1.x

Hi devs, I have a feeling that we recently try to respect semantic versioning, at least separating feature updates and bugfixes. Recently we released 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 continuously, which was OK since it addressed performance regressions and critical bugs. I'm curious that we want to maintain