Ok looks like we have consensus on raising the baseline. I am also fine to
directly move to 21, if no one objects.
Actually, I would suggest, that we run the next release with Java 11 to get out
the open fixes and dependency updates,
formally announce the switch to a new Java baseline version fo
I concur
+1 (binding)
Cheers folks
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 16:40, Julien Nioche
wrote:
>
> +1 for either 17 or 21
>
> Julien
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 13:23, Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
> avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) even if I would love a bigger jump, i.e., to JDK 21 so as to
+1 for either 17 or 21
Julien
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 at 13:23, Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) even if I would love a bigger jump, i.e., to JDK 21 so as to
> open the road to the use of virtual threads for executors !
>
> Thanks,
> Alexandre
>
> Le ven. 8 no
+1 (binding) even if I would love a bigger jump, i.e., to JDK 21 so as to
open the road to the use of virtual threads for executors !
Thanks,
Alexandre
Le ven. 8 nov. 2024, 11:03, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> As we continue to develop Apache Storm, maintaining compatibility w
