Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2625#discussion_r179931931
--- Diff:
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker/WorkerState.java ---
@@ -599,20 +613,16 @@ public WorkerTopologyContext
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2625#discussion_r179931937
--- Diff:
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker/WorkerState.java ---
@@ -599,20 +613,16 @@ public WorkerTopologyContext
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2625#discussion_r179931950
--- Diff:
storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker/WorkerState.java ---
@@ -339,6 +344,15 @@ public WorkerState(Map conf,
Github user revans2 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2622
@HeartSaVioR
Great catch I forgot to update the normal has Map/HashMap to a
ConcurrentHashMap. Yes the guarantees of ConcurrentMap allow for retry and we
do have side effects in some of
Github user hummelm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2591
pull request for master branch:
[https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2625](https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2625)
---
GitHub user hummelm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2625
fix STORM-2979 (master branch)
Add in WorkerState an internal list of deserialized workerHooks and use it
to
start/stop
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2591
@hummelm
Yes since two branches are diverged so I can't port forward/back.
---
Github user hummelm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2591
for master branch do I have to create a new pull request ?
---
Thanks to everyone here and on the PMC list ! -Roshan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, April 6, 2018, 3:41 PM, Raghav Kumar Gautam
wrote:
Congratulations Roshan !!!
On 2018/04/06 10:59:07, Satish Duggana wrote:
> Congratulations Roshan!!>
>
>