Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.2.0 (RC2)

+1 I compiled from the source code tar.gz , unit test passed. The *ThroughputVsLatency* check and other manual checks for Basic DRPC works fine. UI functionality - search/profile actions work. LogViewer - search functionality works. -Kishor On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:18 PM Govind Menon wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.2.0 (RC2)

+1 I compiled from the source code tar.gz , unit test passed. The *ThroughputVsLatency* check and other manual checks for Basic DRPC works fine. UI functionality - search/profile actions work. LogViewer - search functionality works. -Kishor On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 2:18 PM Govind Menon wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.2.0 (RC1)

nvironments with low cpu resources now. Thanks. >> >> > On Jun 15, 2020, at 12:34 PM, Kishorkumar Patil < >> kishorvpa...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > The rest of the tests are working fine. Manual running of throughput vs >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.2.0 (RC1)

The rest of the tests are working fine. Manual running of throughput vs latency and other manual checks for DRPC work fine. The unit test *ExecutorTransferMultiThreadingTest* we added fails consistently for me on VM/mac for low CPU. So -1 on this release candidate. Ethan has a patch to fix this -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.2.0

; The fix is ready. Please review > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3280 > > <https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/3280> > > > > > On Jun 4, 2020, at 11:34 AM, Kishorkumar Patil < > kishorvpa...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.2.0

Hi Julian, I agree with you on this. Ethan has a fix that will resolve both these issues. We should get the change in and cut another RC. -Kishor On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:23 PM Julien Nioche wrote: > Hi, > > Great to see that there has been some work on Storm 2 recently but I am > afraid

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.1.0 (rc5)

+1. Built from code. Executed based wordcount and drpc topologies. I executed and compared Based ThroughtputVsLatency and performance and resource uses is same as 2.0.0 release. -Kishor On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:44 PM Aaron Gresch wrote: > +1 > > Built and ran tests from source. > Ran local

Re: Steps for Updating Storm Website

Roshan, Please find documentation for adding/updating site documentation https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/DEVELOPER.md#contribute-documentation . Essentially, it comes down to updating the github: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm-site.git;a=summary -Kishor On Mon,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer/PMC Member Aaron Gresch

Congratulations Aaron! On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 8:14 PM Derek Dagit wrote: > Welcome, Aaron! > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 08:18:40AM -0500, Ethan Li wrote: > > > > Congratulations, Aaron! > > > > Ethan Li > > > > > On Aug 10, 2019, at 07:36, Alexandre Vermeerbergen < > avermeerber...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.3 (rc2)

Thank you Taylor.. On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:15 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > This vote is now closed and passes with 3 binding +1 votes and 1 > non-binding +1 vote. > > I will release the artifacts and create a release announcement. > > -Taylor > > > On May 10, 2019, at 12:20 PM, P. Taylor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.3 (rc2)

+1 ( binding) Jungtaek, I am validated the release yesterday, Being PMC, my vote is binding. -Kishor On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 6:13 AM Jungtaek Lim wrote: > We have one binding vote needed to pass the RC. Could any PMC participate > and finalize the vote? > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:06 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

Built from the source code. All Unit tests passed. Ran some basic tests with WordCountTopology, BasicDRPCTopology. Run ThroughputVsLatency for comparison and it looks good- with 99.9% of events processed within 5.4ms. +1 On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:16 PM Derek Dagit wrote: > OK ran the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc4)

Aaron, Thank you for patch and suggesting the work around in the mean time. The PR for STORM-3317 is merged into master now. Considering the work around exists for STORM-3317, I am open to either go ahead with current RC or create a new one. Thanks, Kishor On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:19 AM Aaron

Re: [VOTE] Migration of git repos to gitbox.apache.org

+1 On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ethan Li wrote: > This is a call to vote on migration of git repos to gitbox.apache.org < > http://gitbox.apache.org/>. > > The following repositories on git-wip-us belong to our project: > - storm-site.git > - storm.git > > All repositories not migrated on

Re: New Storm Committer and PMC Member

Congratulations Govind! -Kishor On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:00 PM Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: > Congratulations. > > Den ons. 9. jan. 2019 kl. 19.55 skrev Roshan Naik > : > > > Congratulations Govind. Roshan > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Wednesday, January 9, 2019,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.3 (rc1)

+1. build from source, unit tests and basic topologies test works. -Kishor On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:29 AM Bobby Evans wrote: > +1 built from the tag. All the unit tests passed and I ran some manual > tests as well. > > Thanks, > > Bobby > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:16 AM Julien Nioche < >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc4)

+1 - built from source code and deployment works. - Ran some of the tests for UI, DRPC, ThroughputVsLatency - Validated UI bugs reported in the recent past are fixed in this version -Kishor On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:29 PM Arun Mahadevan wrote: > +1 > > - Downloaded the binaries and

Re: Storm 2.0.0 release?

+1 On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 5:04 AM Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: > +1 > > Den lør. 5. jan. 2019 kl. 07.42 skrev Govind Menon < > govindappume...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 > > > > On Jan 4, 2019 23:46, "Roshan Naik" > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc3)

+1 to release this package. I ran unit tests, some basic functionality test, tested manually some of the UI features and profiling issues reported as part of the blockers. I did not notice any silent failures either - or any failures/exception in the logs. Also verified packaging is using

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc2)

Agreed. We should deprecate repl and make STORM-3253 part of 2.0 RC. -Kishor On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:14 PM Derek Dagit wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:53 AM Kishorkumar Patil > > wrote: > > > We need to fix the possible leaking of slot in > > https://issue

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc2)

We need to fix the possible leaking of slot in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3254. The patch is up https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2876 -Kishor On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 1:47 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Canceling so blockers can be fixed for the 2.0.0 release. > > -Taylor > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc2)

ified the signature and SHA512 for the source and binary tars. > > > > > > > > We should consider deleting the md5 files, Apache's release policy > > > > recommends against including them in a release > > > > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distributio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc2)

+1 to release this package. I ran basic tests, and fucntionality tested manually some of the UI features and profiling issues reported as part of the blockers. I did not notice any silent failures either - or any failures/exception in the logs. Regards -Kishor On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 4:05 PM

Re: Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

+1. It would be nice to clean up old clutter while we are getting ready for days past 2.x -Kishor On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:52 PM Bobby Evans wrote: > +1 > > Sounds good to me > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:50 PM Derek Dagit > wrote: > > > Currently there are over 150 open pull requests on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

I have patch up for WorkerToken Auto renewal fix. I think this should be added to 2.x RC. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3235 https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2850 -Kishor On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Jungtaek, can you elaborate on the issues you

Re: Regarding releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0

Looking into all issues reported under epic https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2714 are resolved/closed. I don't see any open issues/blockers at this point for going ahead with 2.x release. I am +1 to 2.0 release. Regards, -Kishor On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:24 PM, P. Taylor Goetz

Re: Running tests via Clojure REPL

up _JAVA_OPTIONS: -Xmx4096m > [INFO] > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > > ... > > Regards, > > Vivian Kong > Linux on z Systems Open Source Ecosystem > IBM Canada Tor

Re: Running tests via Clojure REPL

Try *./dev-tools/test-ns.py org.apache.storm.drcp_test* Kishor On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Vivian Kong wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am following > https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/master/DEVELOPER.md#testing-1 to try > to run a subset of storm-core tests via the Clojure REPL but I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.3 (rc2)

+1 Kishor On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > REMINDER: The vote has been opened from 5 days ago, and still has only one > binding +1s. Please verify the release candidate and vote. > > 2018년 5월 19일 (토) 오전 10:49, Jungtaek Lim 님이 작성: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.2 (rc3)

+1. LGTM. Kishor On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Jungtaek Lim wrote: > REMINDER: The vote has been opened from 6 days ago, and still has only two > binding +1s. Please verify the release candidate and vote. > > 2018년 5월 21일 (월) 오후 11:16, Julien Nioche

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.1 (rc1)

I built and ran some manual tests. +1 to release this package. -Kishor On Tuesday, July 25, 2017, 12:08:32 PM EDT, Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: Is it on purpose that this is cut from 1.x-branch and not 1.1.x-branch? 2017-07-25 17:09 GMT+02:00 P. Taylor Goetz

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.4 (rc1)

I built and I ran manual tests. It looks good to me. I am +1 on the release. -Kishor On Tuesday, July 25, 2017, 11:19:46 AM EDT, Bobby Evans wrote: I built from source (v1.0.4 a5e1c154b5b2ae74fd78bf10d4c130afb1ad4513), ran all of the unit tests, and ran a few

Re: [VOTE] Java Code Style Standard for Apache Storm.

[1] Google Java Style Guide [2] Sun Java Code Conventions [3] HBase style (sorry all I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.3 (RC2)

<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/storm/apache-storm-1.0.3/> -Taylor > On Feb 13, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Kishorkumar Patil <kpa...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > The files are missing from dist. I am getting 404. > -Kishor > > >    On Monday, Februa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.3 (RC2)

The files are missing from dist. I am getting 404. -Kishor On Monday, February 13, 2017 2:36 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: +1 Performed my typical checks and verified topology visualization fix and local shutdown issue. -Taylor > On Feb 7, 2017, at 3:51 PM, P.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.3 (rc1)

+1 I ran some sample tests. LGTM. -Kishor On Saturday, February 4, 2017 12:15 PM, Alexandre Vermeerbergen wrote: Hello again, I confirm +1 (non binding), with the following setup (modifed yesterday to use Kafka Brokers 0.10.1 instead of Kafka Brokers 0.9.2

Re: Is this the list of metrics reported by storm in JMX?

Alessandro, One caution is "num-getClusterInfo-calls" is not strictly number of thrift calls but # of times method was invoked. We do not have separate thrift entry method from rest of the internal calls to getClusterInfo Regards, -Kishor On Friday, October 14, 2016 8:31 AM, Alessandro

Re: Auto-generating documentation site..

storm.apache.org/ Are there new >> instructions or a new version required for this?  - Bobby >> >> >>    On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 11:35 AM, Kishorkumar Patil >> <kpa...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >> Hello Taylor, >> I have pus

Re: Welcome JStorm Community!

Welcome! Looking forward to working with integrated Storm team! Special Kudos to Taylor and others who are helping accomplish this. Regards,Kishor On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 11:35 AM, Priyank Shah wrote: Welcome everyone from JStorm community. Look

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0 (rc1)

+1. Verified by running some sample tests. -Kishor On Monday, October 26, 2015 1:17 PM, Derek Dagit wrote: apache-storm-0.10.0-src.tar.gz.sha apache-storm-0.10.0.tar.gz.sha I found these two files are gzipped, but the other *sha files are OK. --

Re: [DISCUSS] How about releasing 0.9.6 and 0.10.0?

elease and hold off on 0.10.0 until STORM-1106 is ready for merge. -Taylor > On Oct 12, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Kishorkumar Patil > <kpa...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: > > The patch is available here. > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/795 > -Kishor > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] How about releasing 0.9.6 and 0.10.0?

I don't want to be a buzzkill, but found that netty client gives up after certain attempts and that can put the worker in really bad state - not talking to another worker at all. Actually there is another critical blocker for 0.10.0 release. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1106 I

Re: [DISCUSS] How about releasing 0.9.6 and 0.10.0?

015 11:27 AM, Kishorkumar Patil <kpa...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: I don't want to be a buzzkill, but found that netty client gives up after certain attempts and that can put the worker in really bad state - not talking to another worker at all. Actually there is another crit

Re: A question about setup-default-uncaught-exception-handler function

Hi Chuanlei, The setup-default-uncaught-exception-handler fails fast in both OOM and other uncaught Exceptions. The difference in treatment is Runtime.halt vs Runtime.exist (Other uncaught exceptions handled here). If the OOM Error, we shutdown JVM using Runtime.halt. In other cases, we call

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0-beta

+1 -Kishor On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:06 PM, Kyle Nusbaum knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote: +1 -- Kyle     On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 9:40 AM, Bobby Evans ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote:   +1 - Bobby     On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 6:52 AM, 임정택

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 0.10.0

Sorry about the delay on this.But pull request [STORM-848] Shade external dependencies is up for review. Regards,Kishor On Thursday, June 4, 2015 9:01 AM, Bobby Evans ev...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote: Sorry to do this so late, but I actually have few things I really want to get

Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Parth Brahmbhatt

Congratulations Parth! -Kishor On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 12:34 PM, Parth Brahmbhatt pbrahmbh...@hortonworks.com wrote: Thanks everyone. Thanks Parth On 4/1/15, 10:29 AM, Kyle Nusbaum knusb...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote: Congratulations! -- Kyle     On Tuesday, March 31,

Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Thomas Becker

congratulations Thomas -Kishor On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 1:49 PM, Derek Dagit der...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID wrote: Welcome! -- Derek - Original Message - From: Harsha st...@harsha.io To: dev@storm.apache.org; P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday,