I have patch up for  WorkerToken Auto renewal fix. I think this should be
added to 2.x RC.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3235
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2850

-Kishor

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 8:04 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jungtaek, can you elaborate on the issues you ran into when testing the rc
> and/or file JIRAs?
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Sep 25, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Nope.  I plan to start looking into them, unless someone else is already
> > doing so.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bobby
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 2:48 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the update. I will cancel the vote.
> >>
> >> Do the fixes you merged cover the bugs that Jungtaek pointed out?
> >>
> >> -Taylor
> >>
> >>> On Sep 25, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Bobby Evans <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just FYI Taylor I just merged in 3 JIRA to the master branch and will
> >>> probably merge in the fix for the UI that Govind mentioned, but all of
> >> them
> >>> would be okay to go into 2.0.0 as well.  Since this RC looks like it is
> >> not
> >>> going to pass if you want to move the tag up on the master branch, that
> >>> would be fine, once we have the fixes in.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Bobby
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:31 AM Govind Menon <gme...@oath.com.invalid>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I introduced a bug with the visualization as part of the UI migration
> >> with
> >>>> the following fix - https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2849. It's
> >> not a
> >>>> show stopper by any means and there's a workaround (specifically
> hiding
> >>>> system stats on the UI). I think we should include this in the RC.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Govind.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:09 PM Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
> >>>> avermeerber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will need a little bit time to test this new release with our 15+
> >>>>> topologies, but it's definitely worth and exiting !
> >>>>> "stay tuned" :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Alexandre Vermeerbergen
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 20:23, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@apache.org>
> a
> >>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88;hb=062bb2f158a66b802a3ad7bdda14fb8f70cf9b88
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc1/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1070
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> >>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Taylor
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to