Dist Area permissions problem

All, Please be advised that the infra team is aware of a permission problem that is affecting podlings ability to write to the incubator dist area. This may cause you to be unable to create staged releases and promote those to the public mirrors. You can track the status in

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Streams to TLP

All, Just as a heads up, don't forget to forward the vote to the general@incubator list so we have a heads up [1]. By the time you put this on the incubator list it should have the resolution drafted. You can use [2] to generate a draft of the resolution once you've nominated a chair. I'll

Re: Streams-based slack digests for asf

Steve, Thanks for following through on this. I think next step, if we want to do this is to work with infra to get the data from streams fed into the ASF archiving systems. And yes, the DigestAI tool is a pain. No response from their support, nothing. All it does is record a few lines and

[NOTICE] Managing Podling Rosters

Podlings, I wanted to raise a point to all, hence the direct emails. The Whimsy PMC has put together a roster tool for managing the committers in a podling. Rather than managing the committer list in your status file, this will keep track and make sure we list out everyone's valid IDs. If you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

, 2016 at 10:37 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Is this test runtime normal? > > Running org.apache.streams.monitoring.tasks.BroadcastMonitorThreadTest > Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

e, and execute streams out of modules. > > It looks like your issue stems from not running `mvn install` on > streams-master prior to streams-project. > > Running `mvn clean install` on each in order should result in BUILD > SUCCESS. > > Steve > > On November 9, 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

ct-0.4-incubating johnament$ On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to > re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM sblackmon wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to > release Apache Streams 0.4 (incubating). > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this > incubator

Re: Streams Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

differences in what Suneel posted and signed off on vs Ate's edits and his sign off. For instance, in your report you mention "PMC member" but podlings are made up of a "PPMC." I would like to see more discussion over haste to post a report. John On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7

Re: Streams Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: > On 2016-11-01 14:46, John D. Ament wrote: > > The reminder emails are keyed off of shepherd assignment, which you are > not > > in > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/shepher

Re: Streams Podling Report Reminder - November 2016

The reminder emails are keyed off of shepherd assignment, which you are not in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/shepherd_assignments.json?revision=1765066=markup Likewise, you're not on the reporting schedule: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 Which is

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

is there anyone on streams to object? Is this going to be more of a reboot or do we expect some amount of going forward? We had a similar case recently with another podling. There was a retirement vote, some community voices, when it came to actually reviving they got part way through and ended

Re: [2ND DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - June 2016

Some in line commentary. I've also included in the to podlings I've made comments on. On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:11 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > All, > > Please find the current draft of the board report below. Its still > missing sign off from mentors o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.1-incubating (rc3)

modules with dependencies on projects that are inactive or unorganized are valid and welcome. Thanks for your feedback. Steve Blackmon sblack...@apache.org On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:03 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Steve, Please update your copyright years. It's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.1-incubating (rc3)

On Sun Jan 25 2015 at 4:02:32 PM Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote: On 2015-01-25 14:12, John D. Ament wrote: Steve, Then more likely than not your license and notice files are not correct. Why? If you have dependencies on non-AL artifacts, their licenses should be in your license file

No release?

Hi Streams, I noticed in your board report you mention no release. When I look at your website, it lists a parent pom release. It looks like you did have a release (even if it's just a small one). So why not make sure it's listed? John