RE: Anybody here?

Ok it must be late, try "because we moved from Jakarta to become..." > -Original Message- > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: July 2, 2004 11:31 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Anybody here? > > > Because we move from Jakarta of become an Apache top level

RE: Anybody here?

Because we move from Jakarta of become an Apache top level project and the mailing lists changed. Try this: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] che.org Steve > -Original Message- > From: Fireball29 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: June 30, 2004 2:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROT

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release?

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Ted Husted wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:13:43 -0700 (PDT), Don Brown wrote: I vote we just roll it anyways. If we have switched to tomcat- style releases, we can just not label it as stable. I asked one of the tomcat guys last nite at the JakartaOne party if they close out a

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release?

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Don Brown wrote: I vote we just roll it anyways. If we have switched to tomcat-style releases, we can just not label it as stable. I asked one of the tomcat guys last nite at the JakartaOne party if they close out all their bugs and he laughed :) You weren't talking to Costin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29898] New: - Unhelpful runtime error is hard to debug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Anybody here?

Hi! Why did this pages stop in March 2004? http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] What about the roadmap? When will Struts 1.2 be released? Cheers, Fireball - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

thoughts on encouraging user development

Hi all, I'm new to this list and looking forward to contributing. Recent list messages have implied a lower community involvement in submitting patches and helping out. I know its not an emergency or anything but I thought I'd throw some ideas out and try to stimulate some discussion on it.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29896] - html:text and some japanese character

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29896] - html:text and some japanese character

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Struts 1.2.1 release?

Sounds good! Thanks for taking care of it. -James -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:15 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.1 release? OK, I'd like to make one last pass on the documentation to be sure everythin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29896] New: - html:text and some japanese character

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts 1.2.1 release?

OK, I'd like to make one last pass on the documentation to be sure everything seems consistent with the 1.2.1 release, and then roll it Sunday night. We can then vote on whether to promote it past Alpha stage, and, if so, mirror the Beta for community testing. -Ted. On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:32:5

action based client side validation

Hi, This tag will work whether you use the VLDAction class or not. It will work the same way as we used to insert the tag in the jsp page. If the formbean has to be validated, we assign value to attribute formName(e.g. formName="sampleForm") and if different methods(actions) have to be validated, w

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29885] - Action based client side validation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29885] - Action based client side validation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts 1.2.1 release?

I changed the bugzilla priority to enhacement for this bug yesterday - I don't know if the problem is my end but I didn't see the usual bugzilla email on this list after I made the change, so I'm posting this here. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29285 Niall - Original Mess

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29885] - Action based client side validation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29885] New: - Action based client side validation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: LazyActionForm

I have submitted LazyDynaBean and LazyDynaClass to commons beanutils. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29879 The version of LazyDynaBean posted on my web site only dealt with "simple" properties, but the version submitted to commons now handles mapped and indexed properties i