DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30355] - Character encodings in html tags

2004-07-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30355. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Struts 1.2.2

2004-07-28 Thread Ted Husted
Wheels on other carts started to squeak this week, and I haven't tagged or rolled 1.2.2 yet. One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30367] - use of more validation.xml

2004-07-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:16:51 -0500, Matt Bathje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-28 15:57 --- P.S. Rather than raising a *bug* report against Struts could you please post problems like this to the user list first. Raising *Bugs*

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread Matt Bathje
Sorry, I must have been REALLY unclear here - I am not saying I expect/want people (or myself in particular) to ask questions on bugzilla and get a quick answer - just the opposite in fact. I totally understand and agree with all the reasons you mention for asking on the user list, and understood

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript

2004-07-28 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-28T11:17:36 Editor: MichaelMcGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript no comment Change Log:

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript

2004-07-28 Thread dev
Date: 2004-07-28T11:19:03 Editor: MichaelMcGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogMultipleImageButtonsWithNoJavaScript no comment Change Log:

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread Robert Michel
Maybe the reprimand should be saved for developers who actually reply to user questions on a bug report or in this list. Once a user gets a response from one of these channels, there is a chance that they'll come back, especially if they don't get an answer on the user list. And once an

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
I don't see this as a big issue and my intention was more of polite request rather than reprimand - although it may not have come accross that way. Seems to me that in a large and (hopefully) expanding community there are always going to be new people that don't know the conventions that this

Re: Struts 1.2.2

2004-07-28 Thread Vic Cekvenich
Sounds very cool! .V Ted Husted wrote: snip One thing I'd like to do first is to link our Acquiring page to the Apache mirroring system, so that the distribution hooks up to the preferred place. I haven't looked into how that is done yet. If anyone else has a clue, please feel free to jump in.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30364] - org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm.validate(DynaValidatorActionForm.java:115)

2004-07-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:49:38 +0100, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see this as a big issue and my intention was more of polite request rather than reprimand - although it may not have come accross that way. Seems to me that in a large and (hopefully) expanding community there