[ANN] Bridgetown IoC Framework

Hi I have been quietly working on my own Inversion of Control lightweight framework over the last couple of months. My itch was scratched when I suddenly realised that ``Commons BeanUtils'' and ``Common Digester'' could be simply combined together into a bean assembly factory. An assembly factory c

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsRelease124

Date: 2004-09-07T21:21:23 Editor: MartinCooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsRelease124 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease124 no comment Change Log: -- @@ -87,6

[Apache Struts Wiki] New: StrutsRelease124

Date: 2004-09-07T21:20:52 Editor: MartinCooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsRelease124 URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease124 no comment New Page: = Struts 1.2.4 Release = == Info == 1. See Struts [http://struts.apache.org/releases.ht

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsReleasePlans

Date: 2004-09-07T21:19:42 Editor: MartinCooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsReleasePlans URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsReleasePlans no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.2 - downgrade quality

+1 That won't stop the endless messages, it will only create a few more, nonetheless we should still do this. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Strut

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.2 - downgrade quality

+1 David --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the problems we've had with 1.2.2, I'd like to retract my +1 for > GA status. > > If one or more of the other voters were to do the same, we could then > adjust the Struts Acquiring Page to reflect that Struts 1.1. is still > the best a

RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.2 - downgrade quality

+1 There are just going to continue to be endless messages on the lists if 1.2.2 is left as GA. James -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 5:34 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.2 - downgrade quality

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.2 - downgrade quality

Given the problems we've had with 1.2.2, I'd like to retract my +1 for GA status. If one or more of the other voters were to do the same, we could then adjust the Struts Acquiring Page to reflect that Struts 1.1. is still the best available version. (At least until 1.2.4 makes the grade.) -Ted.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 08:46:26 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: > I don't know if there's a protocol about this, but actually, I > wasn't quite clear on why Martin was being tentative about > describing the release he cut as "officially" 1.2.3. The build was officially named "1.2.3", but, as Martin says,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31023] - Action Grouping

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 08:46:26 -0500, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 6:07 AM -0400 9/7/04, Ted Husted wrote: > >On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that > >> if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 relea

Re: Java Analysis Tool

There has actually been a 'pmd' target in the Struts Ant build file for quite some time. ;-) -- Martin Cooper On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 07:40:04 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just found an interessting homepage listed on apache.org, > however it provides the followi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30872] - Struts Validation - Client Side required field validation fails for SELECT lists and checkboxes

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31097] New: - Struts-faces renders blank pages when refreshing page.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31080] - struts-examples - Javascript Registration Form and other fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

At 6:07 AM -0400 9/7/04, Ted Husted wrote: On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 release then we should also take the opportunity to fix this bug as well: If it were just a mat

i've a form which has AttachmentName and URL and 3 buttons[add,update,delete]

i've a form which has AttachmentName and URL and 3 buttons[add,update,delete] the screen first appear as 1)for the relevant attachment name one select box will be display,user has provision to select the attachment from the select box and change the URL ,then it will added to the DB. 2) when the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Struts to Subversion

+1 -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 4:23 PM Subject: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Stru

Re: [PROPOSAL] Struts 1.2.3 release

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that > if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 release then we should also take > the opportunity to fix this bug as well: If it were just a matter of patching the DTD's on the Str

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30696] - Struts-Tiles-JSF-Integration SOMETIMES creates blank pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu