Re: The Future of Struts Validation?

I've written a proposal for what Commons Validator 2.0 xml might look like here: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/validator_2_0_0_proposal.dtd It's an attempt to simplify things as well as make validator more flexible for web and non-web usage. Comments, criticisms, and suggestions are

The Future of Struts Validation?

I posted his on the users list when I probably should have posted it here. So here' the repeat from those not lurking on both lists. I've create an enhancement on Bugzilla relating to this post at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32217. ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32215] - Ability to extend Struts tags implementation cleanly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32217] New: - Add 'validation' attribute to ActionMappings to control which validation to perform

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32215] New: - Ability to extend Struts tags implementation cleanly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: URL validation

Url validation is part of Commons Validator rather than Struts so it might be more appropriate to raise it there. Also, this is subject to an outstanding bug: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30686 Niall - Original Message - From: "David Bowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

URL validation

There was a very good conversation in April on this list discussing URL validation, in particular, is an http URL valid if no path is specified? For example http://google.com. See this link: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@struts.apache.org/msg00037.html for more detail. It seemed like the conse

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32176] - warn if Boolean or String[] are not reset() i.e. checkbox and multibox tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

Date: 2004-11-12T07:32:10 Editor: RoryWinston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -18,7 +18,7

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

Date: 2004-11-12T07:31:56 Editor: RoryWinston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -48,4 +48,6

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

Date: 2004-11-12T07:31:08 Editor: RoryWinston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -8,6 +8,8 @

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

Date: 2004-11-12T07:26:01 Editor: RoryWinston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -6,6 +6,8 @

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

Date: 2004-11-12T07:24:19 Editor: RoryWinston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,6 +1,10

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsArticles

Date: 2004-11-12T07:22:09 Editor: RoryWinston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsArticles URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsArticles no comment Change Log: -- @@ -6,6 +6,8 @

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32176] - warn if Boolean or String[] are not reset() i.e. checkbox and multibox tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32176] - warn if Boolean or String[] are not reset() i.e. checkbox and multibox tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24119] - warn if form values initialized

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32197] New: - Taglibs should use ConvertUtils.convert(Object) instead of .toString()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu